BAC vs. VEA
BAC (Bank of America Corporation) is a stock, while VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Over the past 10 years, BAC returned 17.09%/yr vs 10.14%/yr for VEA. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BAC vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAC achieves a -1.43% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 12.02% return. Over the past 10 years, BAC has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 17.09%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.14% annualized return.
BAC
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- -1.43%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 21.86%
- 3Y*
- 25.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 17.09%
VEA
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
BAC vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | -1.43% | 28.04% | 33.85% | 4.83% | -23.82% | 49.61% | -11.63% | 46.19% | -15.00% | 35.69% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 12.02% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAC and VEA is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007 | 0.56 |
The correlation between BAC and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAC vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
BAC
VEA
BAC vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAC | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.32 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 2.42 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.15 | 9.39 | -6.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAC | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.75 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.55 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.59 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.24 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
BAC vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.10%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAC | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.10% | -60.68% | -32.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.93% | -11.63% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.51% | -13.45% | -14.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.64% | -29.71% | -16.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.95% | -35.73% | -13.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.30% | -3.40% | -1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.31% | -13.29% | -15.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.95% | 3.00% | +3.95% |
Volatility
BAC vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
Bank of America Corporation (BAC) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 6.03%. This indicates that BAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAC | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 6.03% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | 13.91% | +2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.50% | 16.15% | +5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.89% | 16.63% | +10.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.70% | 17.40% | +13.30% |
Dividends
BAC vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than VEA's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 2.09% | 1.96% | 2.28% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.69% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAC and VEA have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAC has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to VEA (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAC dropped -93.10% vs VEA's -60.68%.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAC and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer