BAC vs. PNNT
BAC (Bank of America Corporation) and PNNT (PennantPark Investment Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — BAC in Banks - Diversified, PNNT in Asset Management. Over the past 10 years, BAC returned 17.09%/yr vs 6.83%/yr for PNNT. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BAC vs. PNNT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAC achieves a -1.43% return, which is significantly higher than PNNT's -30.57% return. Over the past 10 years, BAC has outperformed PNNT with an annualized return of 17.09%, while PNNT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.83% annualized return.
BAC
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- -1.43%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 21.86%
- 3Y*
- 25.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 17.09%
PNNT
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -15.02%
- YTD
- -30.57%
- 6M
- -29.01%
- 1Y
- -33.64%
- 3Y*
- 0.71%
- 5Y*
- 0.56%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
BAC vs. PNNT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | -1.43% | 28.04% | 33.85% | 4.83% | -23.82% | 49.61% | -11.63% | 46.19% | -15.00% | 35.69% |
PNNT PennantPark Investment Corporation | -30.57% | -2.96% | 16.56% | 37.25% | -8.90% | 61.71% | -17.99% | 14.30% | 2.05% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAC and PNNT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007 | 0.41 |
The correlation between BAC and PNNT shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BAC:
$4.19
PNNT:
$302.41
BAC:
12.79
PNNT:
0.01
BAC:
5.14
PNNT:
0.00
BAC:
2.32
PNNT:
2.18
BAC:
$174.85B
PNNT:
$85.01M
BAC:
$110.47B
PNNT:
$24.12M
BAC:
$41.74B
PNNT:
$16.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAC vs. PNNT — Risk / Return Rank
BAC
PNNT
BAC vs. PNNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAC | PNNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.78 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | -0.79 | +2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.15 | -1.69 | +4.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAC | PNNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | -1.25 | +2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.02 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.21 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.13 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
BAC vs. PNNT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.10%, which is greater than PNNT's maximum drawdown of -82.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and PNNT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAC | PNNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.10% | -82.16% | -10.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.93% | -42.61% | +24.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.51% | -42.61% | +15.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.64% | -42.61% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.95% | -69.14% | +20.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.30% | -40.90% | +35.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.31% | -15.28% | -13.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.95% | 19.92% | -12.97% |
Volatility
BAC vs. PNNT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is 6.59%, while PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) has a volatility of 14.65%. This indicates that BAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAC | PNNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 14.65% | -8.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | 23.99% | -7.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.50% | 27.16% | -5.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.89% | 23.80% | +3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.70% | 32.77% | -2.07% |
Dividends
BAC vs. PNNT - Dividend Comparison
BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than PNNT's 25.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 2.09% | 1.96% | 2.28% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% |
PNNT PennantPark Investment Corporation | 25.20% | 16.11% | 12.85% | 11.65% | 10.43% | 6.93% | 11.71% | 11.03% | 11.30% | 10.42% | 14.62% | 18.12% |
Financials
BAC vs. PNNT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of America Corporation and PennantPark Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BAC and PNNT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNNT has higher volatility (14.65%) compared to BAC (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAC dropped -93.10% vs PNNT's -82.16%.
BAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAC and PNNT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer