BAB.L vs. KOG.OL
BAB.L (Babcock International Group plc) and KOG.OL (Kongsberg Gruppen ASA) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — BAB.L in Engineering & Construction, KOG.OL in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 10 years, BAB.L returned 2.11%/yr vs 36.54%/yr for KOG.OL. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BAB.L vs. KOG.OL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BAB.L is traded in GBp, while KOG.OL is traded in NOK. To make them comparable, the KOG.OL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAB.L achieves a -16.49% return, which is significantly lower than KOG.OL's 28.43% return. Over the past 10 years, BAB.L has underperformed KOG.OL with an annualized return of 2.11%, while KOG.OL has yielded a comparatively higher 36.54% annualized return.
BAB.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -16.49%
- 6M
- -11.73%
- 1Y
- -1.13%
- 3Y*
- 49.51%
- 5Y*
- 29.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.11%
KOG.OL
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- 28.43%
- 6M
- 31.66%
- 1Y
- -7.74%
- 3Y*
- 55.99%
- 5Y*
- 58.79%
- 10Y*
- 36.54%
BAB.L vs. KOG.OL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc | -16.49% | 150.05% | 27.98% | 40.56% | -11.42% | 13.83% | -55.53% | 36.99% | -27.77% | -23.36% |
KOG.OL Kongsberg Gruppen ASA | 28.43% | 7.41% | 153.69% | 16.87% | 90.16% | 63.67% | 35.91% | 14.40% | -8.65% | 19.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAB.L and KOG.OL is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, BAB.L and KOG.OL have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAB.L vs. KOG.OL — Risk / Return Rank
BAB.L
KOG.OL
BAB.L vs. KOG.OL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and Kongsberg Gruppen ASA (KOG.OL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAB.L | KOG.OL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.02 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | -0.18 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | -0.32 | +0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAB.L | KOG.OL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | -0.15 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 1.51 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 | 1.02 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.67 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
BAB.L vs. KOG.OL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAB.L drawdown since its inception was -80.40%, which is greater than KOG.OL's maximum drawdown of -47.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAB.L and KOG.OL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAB.L | KOG.OL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.40% | -47.60% | -32.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.28% | -41.04% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.28% | -41.04% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.28% | -41.04% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.18% | -47.60% | -31.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.89% | -26.09% | -4.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.15% | -17.74% | -10.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.04% | 22.42% | -8.38% |
Volatility
BAB.L vs. KOG.OL - Volatility Comparison
Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) has a higher volatility of 11.68% compared to Kongsberg Gruppen ASA (KOG.OL) at 11.09%. This indicates that BAB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KOG.OL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAB.L | KOG.OL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.68% | 11.09% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.79% | 37.07% | -11.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.92% | 48.85% | -13.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.56% | 39.00% | -5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.38% | 36.17% | +0.21% |
Dividends
BAB.L vs. KOG.OL - Dividend Comparison
BAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than KOG.OL's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc | 0.67% | 0.56% | 1.06% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.78% | 6.08% | 4.04% | 2.75% | 2.38% |
KOG.OL Kongsberg Gruppen ASA | 1.60% | 1.41% | 0.90% | 12.89% | 18.41% | 2.31% | 5.86% | 1.50% | 2.29% | 2.05% | 2.82% | 2.42% |
Financials
BAB.L vs. KOG.OL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Babcock International Group plc and Kongsberg Gruppen ASA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BAB.L and KOG.OL have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BAB.L and KOG.OL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer