PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAB.L vs. KBGGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAB.L vs. KBGGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and Kongsberg Gruppen ASA (KBGGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BAB.L is traded in GBp, while KBGGY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KBGGY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAB.L achieves a -16.49% return, which is significantly lower than KBGGY's 58.41% return.


BAB.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
-16.49%
6M
-11.73%
1Y
-1.13%
3Y*
49.51%
5Y*
29.01%
10Y*
2.11%

KBGGY

1D
1.68%
1M
1.40%
YTD
58.41%
6M
58.87%
1Y
-41.39%
3Y*
66.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAB.L vs. KBGGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
-16.49%150.05%27.98%24.35%
KBGGY
Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
58.41%10.52%169.22%-4.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BAB.L and KBGGY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2023

0.21

Over the past year, BAB.L and KBGGY have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAB.L vs. KBGGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAB.L
BAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

KBGGY
KBGGY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
KBGGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBGGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBGGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
KBGGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBGGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAB.L vs. KBGGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and Kongsberg Gruppen ASA (KBGGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAB.LKBGGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.90

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

-0.62

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.08

-0.78

+0.70

BAB.L vs. KBGGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAB.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is higher than the KBGGY Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAB.L and KBGGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAB.LKBGGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

-0.68

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

1.05

-0.75

Drawdowns

BAB.L vs. KBGGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAB.L drawdown since its inception was -80.40%, which is greater than KBGGY's maximum drawdown of -67.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAB.L and KBGGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAB.LKBGGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.40%

-67.28%

-13.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.28%

-67.28%

+31.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.28%

-67.28%

+31.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.89%

-42.91%

+12.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.15%

-20.17%

-7.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.04%

53.26%

-39.22%

Volatility

BAB.L vs. KBGGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) is 11.68%, while Kongsberg Gruppen ASA (KBGGY) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that BAB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBGGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAB.LKBGGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.68%

13.02%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.79%

37.82%

-12.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.92%

61.43%

-26.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.56%

61.34%

-27.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.38%

61.34%

-24.96%

Dividends

BAB.L vs. KBGGY - Dividend Comparison

BAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than KBGGY's 24.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
0.67%0.56%1.06%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.78%6.08%4.04%2.75%2.38%
KBGGY
Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
24.23%5.82%1.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BAB.L vs. KBGGY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Babcock International Group plc and Kongsberg Gruppen ASA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.90B2.00B2.10B2.20B2.30B2.40B2.50BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJuly
2.54B
(BAB.L) Total Revenue
(KBGGY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BAB.L values in GBp, KBGGY values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BAB.L and KBGGY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAB.L and KBGGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer