BAB.L vs. CHG.L
BAB.L (Babcock International Group plc) and CHG.L (Chemring Group plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — BAB.L in Engineering & Construction, CHG.L in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 10 years, BAB.L returned 2.11%/yr vs 16.39%/yr for CHG.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BAB.L vs. CHG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAB.L achieves a -16.49% return, which is significantly lower than CHG.L's 9.00% return. Over the past 10 years, BAB.L has underperformed CHG.L with an annualized return of 2.11%, while CHG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.39% annualized return.
BAB.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -16.49%
- 6M
- -11.73%
- 1Y
- -1.13%
- 3Y*
- 49.51%
- 5Y*
- 29.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.11%
CHG.L
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- 6.12%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 7.18%
- 1Y
- -11.06%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- 16.39%
BAB.L vs. CHG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc | -16.49% | 150.05% | 27.98% | 40.56% | -11.42% | 13.83% | -55.53% | 36.99% | -27.77% | -23.36% |
CHG.L Chemring Group plc | 9.00% | 46.54% | -4.46% | 20.37% | 2.15% | 5.20% | 20.90% | 52.51% | -10.88% | 9.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAB.L and CHG.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2006 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, BAB.L and CHG.L have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
BAB.L:
£5.32B
CHG.L:
£1.42B
BAB.L:
£0.94
CHG.L:
£0.28
BAB.L:
11.09
CHG.L:
18.24
BAB.L:
0.56
CHG.L:
1.38
BAB.L:
7.35
CHG.L:
3.84
BAB.L:
£9.58B
CHG.L:
£1.02B
BAB.L:
£699.70M
CHG.L:
£1.01B
BAB.L:
£961.50M
CHG.L:
£193.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAB.L vs. CHG.L — Risk / Return Rank
BAB.L
CHG.L
BAB.L vs. CHG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and Chemring Group plc (CHG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAB.L | CHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.96 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | -0.48 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | -0.91 | +0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAB.L | CHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | -0.35 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.46 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 | 0.50 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.15 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
BAB.L vs. CHG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAB.L drawdown since its inception was -80.40%, roughly equal to the maximum CHG.L drawdown of -79.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAB.L and CHG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAB.L | CHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.40% | -79.66% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.28% | -23.04% | -13.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.28% | -27.69% | -8.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.28% | -29.12% | -7.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.18% | -41.54% | -37.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.89% | -14.02% | -16.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.15% | -41.58% | +13.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.04% | 12.09% | +1.95% |
Volatility
BAB.L vs. CHG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) is 11.68%, while Chemring Group plc (CHG.L) has a volatility of 13.43%. This indicates that BAB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAB.L | CHG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.68% | 13.43% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.79% | 24.16% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.92% | 31.12% | +3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.56% | 29.31% | +4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.38% | 32.48% | +3.90% |
Dividends
BAB.L vs. CHG.L - Dividend Comparison
BAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than CHG.L's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc | 0.67% | 0.56% | 1.06% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.78% | 6.08% | 4.04% | 2.75% | 2.38% |
CHG.L Chemring Group plc | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.19% | 1.74% | 1.71% | 1.42% | 1.30% | 1.41% | 1.92% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BAB.L vs. CHG.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Babcock International Group plc and Chemring Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BAB.L vs. CHG.L - Profitability Comparison
BAB.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported a gross profit of 234.30M and revenue of 2.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.
CHG.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chemring Group plc reported a gross profit of 222.10M and revenue of 237.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.6%.
BAB.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported an operating income of 234.30M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
CHG.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chemring Group plc reported an operating income of 21.70M and revenue of 237.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
BAB.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported a net income of 169.30M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.
CHG.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chemring Group plc reported a net income of 6.10M and revenue of 237.30M, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BAB.L and CHG.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BAB.L and CHG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer