PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAB.L vs. AVON.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAB.L vs. AVON.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and Avon Protection plc (AVON.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAB.L achieves a -16.49% return, which is significantly lower than AVON.L's -7.36% return. Over the past 10 years, BAB.L has underperformed AVON.L with an annualized return of 2.11%, while AVON.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.38% annualized return.


BAB.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
-16.49%
6M
-11.73%
1Y
-1.13%
3Y*
49.51%
5Y*
29.01%
10Y*
2.11%

AVON.L

1D
0.48%
1M
0.36%
YTD
-7.36%
6M
-6.33%
1Y
-4.82%
3Y*
25.44%
5Y*
-7.47%
10Y*
8.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAB.L vs. AVON.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
-16.49%150.05%27.98%40.56%-11.42%13.83%-55.53%36.99%-27.77%-23.36%
AVON.L
Avon Protection plc
-7.36%24.82%76.14%-17.17%-0.91%-64.25%52.60%69.35%3.63%18.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BAB.L and AVON.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2006

0.13

Over the past year, BAB.L and AVON.L have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAB.L:

£5.32B

AVON.L:

£511.89M

EPS

BAB.L:

£0.94

AVON.L:

£0.71

PE Ratio

BAB.L:

11.09

AVON.L:

23.50

PS Ratio

BAB.L:

0.56

AVON.L:

0.90

PB Ratio

BAB.L:

7.35

AVON.L:

2.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAB.L:

£9.58B

AVON.L:

£570.26M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAB.L:

£699.70M

AVON.L:

£232.67M

EBITDA (TTM)

BAB.L:

£961.50M

AVON.L:

£76.45M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAB.L vs. AVON.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAB.L
BAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

AVON.L
AVON.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AVON.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVON.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVON.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
AVON.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVON.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAB.L vs. AVON.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and Avon Protection plc (AVON.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAB.LAVON.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.99

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

-0.16

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.08

-0.33

+0.25

BAB.L vs. AVON.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAB.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is higher than the AVON.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAB.L and AVON.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAB.LAVON.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

-0.18

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

-0.15

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

0.20

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.33

-0.04

Drawdowns

BAB.L vs. AVON.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAB.L drawdown since its inception was -80.40%, smaller than the maximum AVON.L drawdown of -87.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAB.L and AVON.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAB.LAVON.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.40%

-87.02%

+6.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.28%

-29.58%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.28%

-32.46%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.28%

-78.24%

+41.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.18%

-85.99%

+6.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.89%

-59.11%

+28.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.15%

-29.42%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.04%

14.54%

-0.50%

Volatility

BAB.L vs. AVON.L - Volatility Comparison

Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) has a higher volatility of 11.68% compared to Avon Protection plc (AVON.L) at 10.70%. This indicates that BAB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVON.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAB.LAVON.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.68%

10.70%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.79%

20.42%

+5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.92%

27.36%

+7.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.56%

48.76%

-15.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.38%

42.38%

-6.00%

Dividends

BAB.L vs. AVON.L - Dividend Comparison

BAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than AVON.L's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVON.L
Avon Protection plc
1.09%1.03%1.21%4.92%3.42%2.53%0.72%0.84%1.08%0.86%0.77%0.62%
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
0.67%0.56%1.06%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.78%6.08%4.04%2.75%2.38%

Financials

BAB.L vs. AVON.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Babcock International Group plc and Avon Protection plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.54B
158.42M
(BAB.L) Total Revenue
(AVON.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

BAB.L vs. AVON.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Babcock International Group plc and Avon Protection plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
9.2%
38.7%
Portfolio components
BAB.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported a gross profit of 234.30M and revenue of 2.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.

AVON.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avon Protection plc reported a gross profit of 61.28M and revenue of 158.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.

BAB.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported an operating income of 234.30M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

AVON.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avon Protection plc reported an operating income of 21.28M and revenue of 158.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.

BAB.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported a net income of 169.30M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.

AVON.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avon Protection plc reported a net income of 10.15M and revenue of 158.42M, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAB.L and AVON.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAB.L and AVON.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer