PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAB.L vs. ABN.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAB.L vs. ABN.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (ABN.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BAB.L is traded in GBp, while ABN.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ABN.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAB.L achieves a -16.49% return, which is significantly lower than ABN.AS's 14.19% return. Over the past 10 years, BAB.L has underperformed ABN.AS with an annualized return of 2.11%, while ABN.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.51% annualized return.


BAB.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
-16.49%
6M
-11.73%
1Y
-1.13%
3Y*
49.51%
5Y*
29.01%
10Y*
2.11%

ABN.AS

1D
0.00%
1M
11.09%
YTD
14.19%
6M
14.38%
1Y
55.38%
3Y*
46.12%
5Y*
36.58%
10Y*
14.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAB.L vs. ABN.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
-16.49%150.05%27.98%40.56%-11.42%13.83%-55.53%36.99%-27.77%-23.36%
ABN.AS
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
14.19%124.41%15.30%12.53%14.01%60.30%-47.76%-19.73%-17.93%39.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BAB.L and ABN.AS is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAB.L vs. ABN.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAB.L
BAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

ABN.AS
ABN.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ABN.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABN.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABN.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ABN.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABN.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAB.L vs. ABN.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (ABN.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAB.LABN.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.34

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

2.99

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.08

8.54

-8.62

BAB.L vs. ABN.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAB.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the ABN.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAB.L and ABN.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAB.LABN.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

2.00

-2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

1.21

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

0.44

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.45

-0.15

Drawdowns

BAB.L vs. ABN.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAB.L drawdown since its inception was -80.40%, which is greater than ABN.AS's maximum drawdown of -76.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAB.L and ABN.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAB.LABN.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.40%

-76.25%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.28%

-17.74%

-18.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.28%

-19.41%

-16.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.28%

-37.57%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.18%

-76.25%

-2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.89%

-4.91%

-25.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.15%

-27.18%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.04%

6.25%

+7.79%

Volatility

BAB.L vs. ABN.AS - Volatility Comparison

Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (ABN.AS) have volatilities of 11.68% and 11.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAB.LABN.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.68%

11.22%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.79%

20.45%

+5.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.92%

26.52%

+8.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.56%

29.72%

+3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.38%

32.83%

+3.55%

Dividends

BAB.L vs. ABN.AS - Dividend Comparison

BAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than ABN.AS's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABN.AS
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
4.56%4.33%10.01%9.49%7.19%5.26%0.00%8.63%7.06%4.05%3.99%0.00%
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
0.67%0.56%1.06%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.78%6.08%4.04%2.75%2.38%

Financials

BAB.L vs. ABN.AS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Babcock International Group plc and ABN AMRO Bank N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. BAB.L values in GBp, ABN.AS values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


BAB.L and ABN.AS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAB.L and ABN.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer