PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BA vs. KO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BA vs. KO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Boeing Company (BA) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BA achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than KO's 14.56% return. Over the past 10 years, BA has underperformed KO with an annualized return of 6.08%, while KO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.99% annualized return.


BA

1D
0.22%
1M
-9.03%
YTD
-0.55%
6M
4.68%
1Y
2.43%
3Y*
-0.21%
5Y*
-2.74%
10Y*
6.08%

KO

1D
0.08%
1M
1.43%
YTD
14.56%
6M
14.00%
1Y
14.71%
3Y*
12.88%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
8.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BA vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BA
The Boeing Company
-0.55%22.67%-32.10%36.84%-5.38%-5.95%-33.90%3.34%11.50%94.72%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
14.56%15.60%8.88%-4.43%10.61%11.37%2.47%20.60%6.77%14.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BA and KO is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1962

0.26

Over the past year, the correlation between BA and KO has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BA:

$176.66B

KO:

$343.14B

EPS

BA:

$2.90

KO:

$3.18

PE Ratio

BA:

74.42

KO:

25.04

PEG Ratio

BA:

11.66

KO:

3.02

PS Ratio

BA:

1.83

KO:

6.96

PB Ratio

BA:

29.54

KO:

10.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

BA:

$92.18B

KO:

$49.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BA:

$4.43B

KO:

$30.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

BA:

$7.13B

KO:

$18.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BA vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BA
BA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
BA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
BA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BA Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

KO
KO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
KO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
KO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
KO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
KO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BA vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Boeing Company (BA) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAKODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.16

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

1.87

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.22

3.66

-3.43

BA vs. KO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BA Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the KO Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BA and KO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAKODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

0.90

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.67

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.50

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.53

-0.23

Drawdowns

BA vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BA drawdown since its inception was -89.45%, which is greater than KO's maximum drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BA and KO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAKODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.45%

-68.23%

-21.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.96%

-7.89%

-17.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.31%

-16.26%

-32.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.76%

-17.27%

-36.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.92%

-36.99%

-40.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.82%

-2.91%

-46.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.02%

-16.09%

-14.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.91%

4.03%

+6.88%

Volatility

BA vs. KO - Volatility Comparison

The Boeing Company (BA) has a higher volatility of 11.06% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 5.81%. This indicates that BA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAKODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.06%

5.81%

+5.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.76%

12.37%

+10.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.87%

16.37%

+15.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.48%

16.10%

+20.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.58%

18.21%

+23.37%

Dividends

BA vs. KO - Dividend Comparison

BA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BA
The Boeing Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.96%2.52%2.12%1.93%2.80%2.52%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
2.59%2.92%3.12%3.12%2.77%2.84%2.99%2.89%3.29%3.23%3.38%3.07%

Financials

BA vs. KO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Boeing Company and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
22.22B
12.47B
(BA) Total Revenue
(KO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BA vs. KO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Boeing Company and The Coca-Cola Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
11.5%
63.0%
Portfolio components
BA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boeing Company reported a gross profit of 2.55B and revenue of 22.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

KO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 7.85B and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.

BA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boeing Company reported an operating income of 448.00M and revenue of 22.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.

KO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.36B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

BA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boeing Company reported a net income of -4.00M and revenue of 22.22B, resulting in a net margin of -0.0%.

KO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 3.92B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BA and KO have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BA has higher volatility (11.06%) compared to KO (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BA dropped -89.45% vs KO's -68.23%.

KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BA and KO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer