PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BA.L vs. TATYY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BA.L vs. TATYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in BAE Systems plc (BA.L) and Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BA.L is traded in GBp, while TATYY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TATYY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BA.L achieves a 15.01% return, which is significantly lower than TATYY's 48.99% return. Over the past 10 years, BA.L has outperformed TATYY with an annualized return of 19.00%, while TATYY has yielded a comparatively lower 4.23% annualized return.


BA.L

1D
1.01%
1M
0.84%
YTD
15.01%
6M
16.57%
1Y
2.85%
3Y*
30.30%
5Y*
32.98%
10Y*
19.00%

TATYY

1D
12.56%
1M
49.20%
YTD
48.99%
6M
52.75%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
-7.77%
5Y*
-0.35%
10Y*
4.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BA.L vs. TATYY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BA.L
BAE Systems plc
15.01%52.12%5.88%33.31%60.92%17.57%-9.28%28.43%-16.75%0.30%
TATYY
Tate & Lyle PLC ADR
48.99%-39.83%1.12%-5.34%32.08%0.29%-4.81%14.74%1.34%0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BA.L and TATYY is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.09

The correlation between BA.L and TATYY shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BA.L:

£59.15B

TATYY:

$3.34B

EPS

BA.L:

£1.33

TATYY:

$2.15

PE Ratio

BA.L:

14.71

TATYY:

13.88

PS Ratio

BA.L:

1.08

TATYY:

0.94

PB Ratio

BA.L:

5.02

TATYY:

2.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

BA.L:

£54.65B

TATYY:

$3.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BA.L:

£4.75B

TATYY:

$722.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

BA.L:

£7.55B

TATYY:

$597.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BA.L vs. TATYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BA.L
BA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
BA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

TATYY
TATYY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
TATYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TATYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TATYY Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TATYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
TATYY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BA.L vs. TATYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAE Systems plc (BA.L) and Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BA.LTATYYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.09

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

0.08

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.30

0.13

+0.17

BA.L vs. TATYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the TATYY Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BA.L and TATYY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BA.LTATYYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

0.06

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.28

-0.01

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.13

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.14

+0.38

Drawdowns

BA.L vs. TATYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BA.L drawdown since its inception was -43.67%, smaller than the maximum TATYY drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BA.L and TATYY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BA.LTATYYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.67%

-58.21%

+14.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.30%

-39.85%

+18.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.30%

-58.21%

+36.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

-58.21%

+36.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.80%

-58.21%

+20.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.43%

-29.25%

+13.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.73%

-15.72%

+2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.64%

25.86%

-16.22%

Volatility

BA.L vs. TATYY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BAE Systems plc (BA.L) is 8.80%, while Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) has a volatility of 39.91%. This indicates that BA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TATYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BA.LTATYYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

39.91%

-31.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.59%

45.12%

-21.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.97%

58.21%

-28.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.82%

38.62%

-12.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.07%

33.71%

-8.64%

Dividends

BA.L vs. TATYY - Dividend Comparison

BA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than TATYY's 3.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BA.L
BAE Systems plc
1.86%1.99%2.69%2.53%2.99%4.40%4.75%4.00%4.79%3.75%3.57%4.14%
TATYY
Tate & Lyle PLC ADR
3.57%5.27%3.03%2.90%19.44%4.72%3.74%3.67%4.18%3.64%3.81%0.00%

Financials

BA.L vs. TATYY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BAE Systems plc and Tate & Lyle PLC ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B202120222023202420252026
14.77B
996.75M
(BA.L) Total Revenue
(TATYY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BA.L values in GBp, TATYY values in USD

BA.L vs. TATYY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BAE Systems plc and Tate & Lyle PLC ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202120222023202420252026
9.2%
0
Portfolio components
BA.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported a gross profit of 1.35B and revenue of 14.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.

TATYY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 996.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BA.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported an operating income of 1.35B and revenue of 14.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

TATYY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported an operating income of 83.23M and revenue of 996.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

BA.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.77B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

TATYY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported a net income of 41.62M and revenue of 996.75M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BA.L and TATYY have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BA.L and TATYY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer