PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZO vs. UEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AZO vs. UEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZO achieves a -9.36% return, which is significantly lower than UEC's 7.96% return. Over the past 10 years, AZO has underperformed UEC with an annualized return of 15.09%, while UEC has yielded a comparatively higher 28.85% annualized return.


AZO

1D
-1.36%
1M
-12.07%
YTD
-9.36%
6M
-18.39%
1Y
-17.35%
3Y*
9.16%
5Y*
17.26%
10Y*
15.09%

UEC

1D
-0.32%
1M
-16.82%
YTD
7.96%
6M
-7.62%
1Y
101.12%
3Y*
59.63%
5Y*
31.89%
10Y*
28.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZO vs. UEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AZO
AutoZone, Inc.
-9.36%5.92%23.84%4.84%17.64%76.84%-0.49%42.10%17.85%-9.93%
UEC
Uranium Energy Corp.
7.96%74.59%4.53%64.95%15.82%90.34%91.47%-26.46%-29.38%58.04%

Correlation

The correlation between AZO and UEC is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2007

0.12

The correlation between AZO and UEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AZO:

$51.80B

UEC:

$6.10B

EPS

AZO:

$145.27

UEC:

-$0.18

PS Ratio

AZO:

2.62

UEC:

290.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

AZO:

$19.99B

UEC:

$20.20M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AZO:

$10.34B

UEC:

$5.72M

EBITDA (TTM)

AZO:

$4.26B

UEC:

-$104.07M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AZO vs. UEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZO
AZO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
AZO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
AZO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

UEC
UEC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
UEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
UEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZO vs. UEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AZOUECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.23

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

2.49

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.15

4.89

-6.04

AZO vs. UEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZO Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the UEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZO and UEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AZOUECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.64

1.34

-1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.43

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.39

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.04

+0.59

Drawdowns

AZO vs. UEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZO drawdown since its inception was -46.32%, smaller than the maximum UEC drawdown of -97.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZO and UEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZOUECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.32%

-97.40%

+51.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.59%

-40.86%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.59%

-53.49%

+20.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.59%

-63.76%

+31.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.14%

-80.59%

+38.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.41%

-37.39%

+7.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

-62.10%

+51.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.08%

20.76%

-5.68%

Volatility

AZO vs. UEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) is 11.38%, while Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) has a volatility of 27.76%. This indicates that AZO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZOUECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.38%

27.76%

-16.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.93%

56.94%

-34.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.20%

76.19%

-48.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.45%

74.18%

-49.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.48%

73.61%

-47.13%

Dividends

AZO vs. UEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither AZO nor UEC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AZO vs. UEC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AutoZone, Inc. and Uranium Energy Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
4.84B
20.20M
(AZO) Total Revenue
(UEC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AZO and UEC have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UEC has higher volatility (27.76%) compared to AZO (11.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZO dropped -46.32% vs UEC's -97.40%.

UEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZO and UEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer