AZO vs. TRAK
AZO (AutoZone, Inc.) and TRAK (Park City Group Inc) are both stocks. AZO operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while TRAK operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past year, AZO returned -17.35% vs -54.07% for TRAK. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AZO vs. TRAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZO achieves a -9.36% return, which is significantly higher than TRAK's -18.70% return.
AZO
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -12.07%
- YTD
- -9.36%
- 6M
- -18.39%
- 1Y
- -17.35%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- 17.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.09%
TRAK
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- -18.70%
- 6M
- -25.66%
- 1Y
- -54.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AZO vs. TRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AZO AutoZone, Inc. | -9.36% | 5.92% | 3.22% |
TRAK Park City Group Inc | -18.70% | -43.84% | 18.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between AZO and TRAK is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2024 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
AZO:
$51.80B
TRAK:
$188.95M
AZO:
$145.27
TRAK:
$104.56
AZO:
21.16
TRAK:
0.10
AZO:
1.83
TRAK:
0.00
AZO:
2.62
TRAK:
0.03
AZO:
$19.99B
TRAK:
$5.90B
AZO:
$10.34B
TRAK:
$5.09B
AZO:
$4.26B
TRAK:
$1.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AZO vs. TRAK — Risk / Return Rank
AZO
TRAK
AZO vs. TRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and Park City Group Inc (TRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AZO | TRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.76 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | -0.81 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | -1.27 | +0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AZO | TRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | -1.26 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | -0.76 | +1.38 |
Drawdowns
AZO vs. TRAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZO drawdown since its inception was -46.32%, smaller than the maximum TRAK drawdown of -70.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZO and TRAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZO | TRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.32% | -70.93% | +24.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.59% | -67.03% | +34.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.41% | -59.11% | +29.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.88% | -32.19% | +21.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.08% | 43.10% | -28.02% |
Volatility
AZO vs. TRAK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) is 11.38%, while Park City Group Inc (TRAK) has a volatility of 12.23%. This indicates that AZO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AZO | TRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.38% | 12.23% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.93% | 33.26% | -10.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.20% | 43.17% | -15.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 40.79% | -16.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 40.79% | -14.31% |
Dividends
AZO vs. TRAK - Dividend Comparison
AZO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AZO AutoZone, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRAK Park City Group Inc | 0.78% | 0.62% | 0.16% |
Financials
AZO vs. TRAK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AutoZone, Inc. and Park City Group Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AZO vs. TRAK - Profitability Comparison
AZO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.52B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.
TRAK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a gross profit of 5.08B and revenue of 5.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.
AZO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported an operating income of 923.76M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.
TRAK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park City Group Inc reported an operating income of 2.25B and revenue of 5.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.3%.
AZO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a net income of 641.49M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
TRAK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a net income of 1.99B and revenue of 5.88B, resulting in a net margin of 33.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AZO and TRAK have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRAK has higher volatility (12.23%) compared to AZO (11.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZO dropped -46.32% vs TRAK's -70.93%.
AZO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.64 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AZO and TRAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer