PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZO vs. SCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AZO vs. SCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and Steelcase Inc. (SCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AZO

1D
-1.36%
1M
-12.07%
YTD
-9.36%
6M
-18.39%
1Y
-17.35%
3Y*
9.16%
5Y*
17.26%
10Y*
15.09%

SCS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZO vs. SCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AZO
AutoZone, Inc.
-9.36%5.92%23.84%4.84%17.64%76.84%-0.49%42.10%17.85%-9.93%
SCS
Steelcase Inc.
0.00%39.89%-9.11%97.75%-36.31%-9.87%-31.43%42.60%1.19%-12.18%

Correlation

The correlation between AZO and SCS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 1998

0.24

The correlation between AZO and SCS shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AZO:

$51.80B

SCS:

$1.93B

EPS

AZO:

$145.27

SCS:

$0.80

PE Ratio

AZO:

21.16

SCS:

20.20

PEG Ratio

AZO:

1.83

SCS:

0.09

PS Ratio

AZO:

2.62

SCS:

0.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

AZO:

$19.99B

SCS:

$3.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AZO:

$10.34B

SCS:

$1.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

AZO:

$4.26B

SCS:

$208.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AZO vs. SCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZO
AZO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
AZO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
AZO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SCS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZO vs. SCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and Steelcase Inc. (SCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AZOSCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.15

AZO vs. SCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AZOSCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

Drawdowns

AZO vs. SCS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZOSCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.08%

Volatility

AZO vs. SCS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZOSCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.48%

Dividends

AZO vs. SCS - Dividend Comparison

Neither AZO nor SCS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZO
AutoZone, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCS
Steelcase Inc.
1.24%1.86%4.23%2.22%6.93%4.56%2.73%2.83%3.64%3.36%3.31%2.27%

Financials

AZO vs. SCS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AutoZone, Inc. and Steelcase Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
4.84B
897.10M
(AZO) Total Revenue
(SCS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AZO vs. SCS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AutoZone, Inc. and Steelcase Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
52.2%
34.8%
Portfolio components
AZO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.52B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

SCS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steelcase Inc. reported a gross profit of 312.10M and revenue of 897.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.

AZO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported an operating income of 923.76M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.

SCS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steelcase Inc. reported an operating income of 53.10M and revenue of 897.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

AZO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a net income of 641.49M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.

SCS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steelcase Inc. reported a net income of 35.00M and revenue of 897.10M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AZO and SCS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZO and SCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer