AZO vs. RCAT
AZO (AutoZone, Inc.) and RCAT (Red Cat Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. AZO operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while RCAT operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, AZO returned 17.26%/yr vs 31.32%/yr for RCAT. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
AZO vs. RCAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZO achieves a -9.36% return, which is significantly lower than RCAT's 57.12% return.
AZO
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -12.07%
- YTD
- -9.36%
- 6M
- -18.39%
- 1Y
- -17.35%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- 17.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.09%
RCAT
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- 20.15%
- YTD
- 57.12%
- 6M
- 50.67%
- 1Y
- 52.70%
- 3Y*
- 139.89%
- 5Y*
- 31.32%
- 10Y*
- —
AZO vs. RCAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZO AutoZone, Inc. | -9.36% | 5.92% | 23.84% | 4.84% | 17.64% | 76.84% | -0.49% | 42.10% | 17.85% | 23.93% |
RCAT Red Cat Holdings, Inc. | 57.12% | -38.29% | 1,360.23% | -6.38% | -54.81% | -30.67% | 172.73% | 73,233.33% | -94.74% | -28.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between AZO and RCAT is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017 | -0.02 |
Fundamentals
AZO:
$51.80B
RCAT:
$1.51B
AZO:
$145.27
RCAT:
-$0.78
AZO:
2.62
RCAT:
25.90
AZO:
$19.99B
RCAT:
$52.98M
AZO:
$10.34B
RCAT:
$2.86M
AZO:
$4.26B
RCAT:
-$79.24M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AZO vs. RCAT — Risk / Return Rank
AZO
RCAT
AZO vs. RCAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AZO | RCAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.17 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 0.88 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 1.77 | -2.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AZO | RCAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | 0.44 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.27 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.00 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
AZO vs. RCAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZO drawdown since its inception was -46.32%, smaller than the maximum RCAT drawdown of -99.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZO and RCAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZO | RCAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.32% | -99.21% | +52.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.59% | -60.08% | +27.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.59% | -67.16% | +34.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.59% | -92.25% | +59.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.41% | -28.23% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.88% | -66.07% | +55.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.08% | 29.86% | -14.78% |
Volatility
AZO vs. RCAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) is 11.38%, while Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) has a volatility of 41.78%. This indicates that AZO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AZO | RCAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.38% | 41.78% | -30.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.93% | 84.03% | -61.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.20% | 119.85% | -92.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 114.96% | -90.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 29,243.53% | -29,217.05% |
Dividends
AZO vs. RCAT - Dividend Comparison
Neither AZO nor RCAT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AZO vs. RCAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AutoZone, Inc. and Red Cat Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AZO and RCAT have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCAT has higher volatility (41.78%) compared to AZO (11.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZO dropped -46.32% vs RCAT's -99.21%.
RCAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AZO and RCAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer