AZO vs. LW
AZO (AutoZone, Inc.) and LW (Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. AZO operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while LW operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, AZO returned 17.26%/yr vs -10.73%/yr for LW. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AZO vs. LW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZO achieves a -9.36% return, which is significantly lower than LW's 3.41% return.
AZO
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -12.07%
- YTD
- -9.36%
- 6M
- -18.39%
- 1Y
- -17.35%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- 17.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.09%
LW
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 6M
- -27.23%
- 1Y
- -21.23%
- 3Y*
- -26.27%
- 5Y*
- -10.73%
- 10Y*
- —
AZO vs. LW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZO AutoZone, Inc. | -9.36% | 5.92% | 23.84% | 4.84% | 17.64% | 76.84% | -0.49% | 42.10% | 17.85% | -9.93% |
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 3.41% | -35.69% | -37.01% | 22.32% | 42.89% | -18.40% | -7.23% | 18.27% | 31.81% | 51.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between AZO and LW is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2016 | 0.18 |
The correlation between AZO and LW shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AZO:
$51.80B
LW:
$5.93B
AZO:
$145.27
LW:
$2.15
AZO:
21.16
LW:
19.79
AZO:
1.83
LW:
0.27
AZO:
2.62
LW:
0.91
AZO:
$19.99B
LW:
$6.52B
AZO:
$10.34B
LW:
$1.34B
AZO:
$4.26B
LW:
$893.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AZO vs. LW — Risk / Return Rank
AZO
LW
AZO vs. LW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AZO | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.94 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | -0.52 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | -0.90 | -0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AZO | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | -0.48 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | -0.29 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.15 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
AZO vs. LW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZO drawdown since its inception was -46.32%, smaller than the maximum LW drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZO and LW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZO | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.32% | -64.56% | +18.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.59% | -41.37% | +8.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.59% | -64.56% | +31.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.59% | -64.56% | +31.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.41% | -60.44% | +31.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.88% | -21.26% | +10.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.08% | 23.67% | -8.59% |
Volatility
AZO vs. LW - Volatility Comparison
AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) has a higher volatility of 11.38% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) at 10.14%. This indicates that AZO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AZO | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.38% | 10.14% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.93% | 38.17% | -15.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.20% | 44.22% | -17.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.45% | 37.84% | -13.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 35.85% | -9.37% |
Dividends
AZO vs. LW - Dividend Comparison
AZO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZO AutoZone, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 3.52% | 3.53% | 2.15% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.48% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.33% |
Financials
AZO vs. LW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AutoZone, Inc. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AZO vs. LW - Profitability Comparison
AZO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.52B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.
LW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 331.60M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.
AZO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported an operating income of 923.76M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.
LW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.60M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
AZO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a net income of 641.49M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
LW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 54.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AZO and LW have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AZO has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to LW (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZO dropped -46.32% vs LW's -64.56%.
LW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.48 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AZO and LW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer