AZN vs. XHYD
AZN (AstraZeneca PLC) is a stock, while XHYD (BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF) is High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical. Over the past 3 years, AZN returned 9.54%/yr vs 7.51%/yr for XHYD. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AZN vs. XHYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZN achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly higher than XHYD's 0.44% return.
AZN
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 9.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.08%
- 10Y*
- 15.85%
XHYD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AZN vs. XHYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 0.81% | 43.30% | -0.62% | 1.44% | 13.79% |
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 0.44% | 8.33% | 6.29% | 11.75% | -5.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between AZN and XHYD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.27 |
The correlation between AZN and XHYD shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AZN vs. XHYD — Risk / Return Rank
AZN
XHYD
AZN vs. XHYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) and BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AZN | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.36 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 10.53 | -5.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AZN | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.55 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.67 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
AZN vs. XHYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZN drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, which is greater than XHYD's maximum drawdown of -11.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZN and XHYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZN | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.94% | -11.02% | -37.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.43% | -2.49% | -12.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.87% | -3.70% | -24.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.90% | -1.08% | -11.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -2.04% | -9.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.75% | 0.56% | +5.19% |
Volatility
AZN vs. XHYD - Volatility Comparison
AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) at 1.83%. This indicates that AZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AZN | XHYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 1.83% | +5.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.47% | 3.28% | +14.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.55% | 3.79% | +21.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.02% | 7.15% | +16.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.94% | 7.15% | +17.79% |
Dividends
AZN vs. XHYD - Dividend Comparison
AZN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, while XHYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 2.93% | 1.70% | 2.27% | 2.15% | 2.12% | 2.35% | 2.80% | 2.81% | 3.69% | 3.95% | 5.01% | 4.06% |
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 5.31% | 5.83% | 6.32% | 5.80% | 5.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AZN and XHYD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AZN has higher volatility (7.42%) compared to XHYD (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZN dropped -48.94% vs XHYD's -11.02%.
XHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AZN and XHYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer