PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZN vs. BT-A.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AZN vs. BT-A.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) and BT Group plc (BT-A.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AZN is traded in USD, while BT-A.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BT-A.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZN achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than BT-A.L's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, AZN has outperformed BT-A.L with an annualized return of 15.85%, while BT-A.L has yielded a comparatively lower -3.17% annualized return.


AZN

1D
-2.37%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.53%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
9.54%
5Y*
12.08%
10Y*
15.85%

BT-A.L

1D
1.54%
1M
-15.27%
YTD
10.13%
6M
17.23%
1Y
18.02%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*
-3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZN vs. BT-A.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AZN
AstraZeneca PLC
0.81%43.30%-0.62%1.44%19.14%19.66%3.12%35.68%13.86%33.10%
BT-A.L
BT Group plc
10.13%43.14%21.63%23.91%-37.69%28.79%-29.17%-8.63%-11.85%-14.56%

Correlation

The correlation between AZN and BT-A.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

0.28

The correlation between AZN and BT-A.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (10 years) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

AZN:

$60.44B

BT-A.L:

£20.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AZN:

$49.37B

BT-A.L:

£9.54B

EBITDA (TTM)

AZN:

$20.47B

BT-A.L:

£7.36B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AZN vs. BT-A.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZN
AZN Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
AZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZN Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
AZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZN Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BT-A.L
BT-A.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BT-A.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZN vs. BT-A.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) and BT Group plc (BT-A.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AZNBT-A.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.14

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

0.80

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.90

1.65

+3.25

AZN vs. BT-A.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZN Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is higher than the BT-A.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZN and BT-A.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AZNBT-A.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

0.65

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.19

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

-0.10

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

-0.01

+0.50

Drawdowns

AZN vs. BT-A.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZN drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, smaller than the maximum BT-A.L drawdown of -83.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZN and BT-A.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZNBT-A.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.94%

-83.54%

+34.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.43%

-22.31%

+6.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.87%

-26.54%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.87%

-52.51%

+24.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.87%

-75.92%

+48.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.90%

-41.39%

+28.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-45.87%

+34.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

10.87%

-5.12%

Volatility

AZN vs. BT-A.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) is 7.42%, while BT Group plc (BT-A.L) has a volatility of 12.02%. This indicates that AZN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BT-A.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZNBT-A.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.42%

12.02%

-4.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.47%

21.42%

-3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.55%

27.65%

-2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.02%

31.59%

-7.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.94%

33.13%

-8.19%

Dividends

AZN vs. BT-A.L - Dividend Comparison

AZN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than BT-A.L's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZN
AstraZeneca PLC
2.93%1.70%2.27%2.15%2.12%2.35%2.80%2.81%3.69%3.95%5.01%4.06%
BT-A.L
BT Group plc
4.01%4.46%5.62%6.23%6.87%1.36%0.00%8.00%6.37%5.67%3.94%2.73%

Financials

AZN vs. BT-A.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AstraZeneca PLC and BT Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B20222023202420252026
15.29B
5.12B
(AZN) Total Revenue
(BT-A.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AZN values in USD, BT-A.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


AZN and BT-A.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZN and BT-A.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer