AVGO vs. XLF
AVGO (Broadcom Inc.) is a stock, while XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, AVGO returned 41.32%/yr vs 12.79%/yr for XLF. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AVGO vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGO achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -4.62% return. Over the past 10 years, AVGO has outperformed XLF with an annualized return of 41.32%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.79% annualized return.
AVGO
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -7.77%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- -0.72%
- 1Y
- 61.91%
- 3Y*
- 72.46%
- 5Y*
- 56.70%
- 10Y*
- 41.32%
XLF
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- -4.62%
- 6M
- -1.98%
- 1Y
- 2.91%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.47%
- 10Y*
- 12.79%
AVGO vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 14.83% | 50.63% | 110.49% | 104.18% | -13.27% | 56.48% | 44.88% | 29.05% | 2.18% | 48.19% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -4.62% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGO and XLF is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2009 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AVGO and XLF has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGO vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
AVGO
XLF
AVGO vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVGO | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.05 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 0.20 | +1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.16 | 0.51 | +4.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVGO | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 0.20 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.32 | 0.46 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.05 | 0.58 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.21 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
AVGO vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGO drawdown since its inception was -48.30%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGO and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGO | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.30% | -82.69% | +34.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.67% | -14.79% | -13.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.15% | -15.54% | -25.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.15% | -25.81% | -15.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.30% | -42.86% | -5.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.64% | -7.38% | -10.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.97% | -20.02% | +12.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.03% | 5.71% | +6.32% |
Volatility
AVGO vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a higher volatility of 20.09% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.20%. This indicates that AVGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGO | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.09% | 4.20% | +15.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.69% | 11.18% | +23.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.31% | 14.61% | +30.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.31% | 18.66% | +24.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.48% | 22.18% | +17.30% |
Dividends
AVGO vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than XLF's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 0.63% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.71% | 3.02% | 2.24% | 3.05% | 3.54% | 3.11% | 1.87% | 1.43% | 1.13% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.52% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGO and XLF have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVGO has higher volatility (20.09%) compared to XLF (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGO dropped -48.30% vs XLF's -82.69%.
AVGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVGO and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer