AVGO vs. LULU

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

AVGO (Broadcom Inc.) and LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) are both stocks. AVGO operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while LULU operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, AVGO returned 41.32%/yr vs 5.24%/yr for LULU. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AVGO vs. LULU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGO achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -43.43% return. Over the past 10 years, AVGO has outperformed LULU with an annualized return of 41.32%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively lower 5.24% annualized return.

AVGO

• 1D: 2.82%
• 1M: -7.77%
• YTD: 14.83%
• 6M: -0.72%
• 1Y: 61.91%
• 3Y*: 72.46%
• 5Y*: 56.70%
• 10Y*: 41.32%

LULU

• 1D: 2.91%
• 1M: -10.39%
• YTD: -43.43%
• 6M: -35.78%
• 1Y: -55.69%
• 3Y*: -31.16%
• 5Y*: -18.52%
• 10Y*: 5.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGO vs. LULU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AVGO Broadcom Inc.	14.83%	50.63%	110.49%	104.18%	-13.27%	56.48%	44.88%	29.05%	2.18%	48.19%
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc.	-43.43%	-45.66%	-25.21%	59.59%	-18.16%	12.48%	50.23%	90.50%	54.74%	20.93%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGO and LULU is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2009	0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between AVGO and LULU has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap AVGO : $1.93T LULU : $13.57B
EPS AVGO : $6.01 LULU : $12.35
PE Ratio AVGO : 65.99 LULU : 9.52
PEG Ratio AVGO : 0.82 LULU : 0.46
PS Ratio AVGO : 25.64 LULU : 1.24
PB Ratio AVGO : 22.05 LULU : 2.70
Total Revenue (TTM) AVGO : $75.47B LULU : $11.20B
Gross Profit (TTM) AVGO : $50.53B LULU : $6.24B
EBITDA (TTM) AVGO : $41.76B LULU : $2.44B

Return for Risk

AVGO vs. LULU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGO

AVGO Risk / Return Rank: 77
AVGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
AVGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
AVGO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
AVGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
AVGO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

LULU

LULU Risk / Return Rank: 2
LULU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
LULU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
LULU Omega Ratio Rank: 3
LULU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
LULU Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGO vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVGO	LULU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	-1.26	+2.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	-1.97	+3.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	0.75	+0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	-1.00	+3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.16	-1.73	+6.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVGO vs. LULU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the LULU Sharpe Ratio of -1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGO and LULU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVGO	LULU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	-1.26	+2.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.32	-0.44	+1.76
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.05	0.13	+0.92
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	0.24	+0.85

Drawdowns

AVGO vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGO drawdown since its inception was -48.30%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGO and LULU.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVGO	LULU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.30%	-92.26%	+43.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.67%	-55.90%	+27.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.15%	-77.66%	+36.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.15%	-77.66%	+36.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.30%	-77.66%	+29.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.64%	-77.01%	+59.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.97%	-27.57%	+19.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.03%	33.71%	-21.68%

Volatility

AVGO vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison

Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a higher volatility of 20.09% compared to Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) at 13.25%. This indicates that AVGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVGO	LULU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.09%	13.25%	+6.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.69%	32.89%	+1.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.31%	44.36%	+0.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.31%	42.19%	+1.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.48%	40.61%	-1.13%

Dividends

AVGO vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison

AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVGO Broadcom Inc.	0.63%	0.70%	0.94%	1.71%	3.02%	2.24%	3.05%	3.54%	3.11%	1.87%	1.43%	1.13%
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

AVGO vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Broadcom Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AVGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.

LULU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.

AVGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.

LULU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 276.95M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.

AVGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.

LULU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 195.05M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVGO and LULU in my portfolio?

AVGO and LULU have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVGO or LULU?

AVGO has higher volatility (20.09%) compared to LULU (13.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGO dropped -48.30% vs LULU's -92.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.