AVGO vs. FTS
AVGO (Broadcom Inc.) and FTS (Fortis Inc) are both stocks. AVGO operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while FTS operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, AVGO returned 41.32%/yr vs 9.61%/yr for FTS. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AVGO vs. FTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGO achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly higher than FTS's 7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, AVGO has outperformed FTS with an annualized return of 41.32%, while FTS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.61% annualized return.
AVGO
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -7.77%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- -0.72%
- 1Y
- 61.91%
- 3Y*
- 72.46%
- 5Y*
- 56.70%
- 10Y*
- 41.32%
FTS
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 6M
- 10.63%
- 1Y
- 19.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
AVGO vs. FTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 14.83% | 50.63% | 110.49% | 104.18% | -13.27% | 56.48% | 44.88% | 29.05% | 2.18% | 48.19% |
FTS Fortis Inc | 7.82% | 29.62% | 5.81% | 7.38% | -13.69% | 22.73% | 1.91% | 29.00% | -5.86% | 24.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGO and FTS is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.13 |
The correlation between AVGO and FTS shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AVGO:
$1.93T
FTS:
$28.01B
AVGO:
$6.01
FTS:
$3.40
AVGO:
65.99
FTS:
16.21
AVGO:
0.82
FTS:
2.36
AVGO:
25.64
FTS:
2.39
AVGO:
22.05
FTS:
1.23
AVGO:
$75.47B
FTS:
$12.22B
AVGO:
$50.53B
FTS:
$7.44B
AVGO:
$41.76B
FTS:
$5.80B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGO vs. FTS — Risk / Return Rank
AVGO
FTS
AVGO vs. FTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Fortis Inc (FTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVGO | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 3.22 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.16 | 8.05 | -2.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVGO | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.50 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.32 | 0.48 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.05 | 0.51 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.61 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
AVGO vs. FTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGO drawdown since its inception was -48.30%, which is greater than FTS's maximum drawdown of -34.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGO and FTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGO | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.30% | -34.36% | -13.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.67% | -6.23% | -22.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.15% | -14.46% | -26.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.15% | -29.96% | -11.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.30% | -34.36% | -13.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.64% | -5.16% | -12.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.97% | -6.84% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.03% | 2.49% | +9.54% |
Volatility
AVGO vs. FTS - Volatility Comparison
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a higher volatility of 20.09% compared to Fortis Inc (FTS) at 4.54%. This indicates that AVGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGO | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.09% | 4.54% | +15.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.69% | 10.48% | +24.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.31% | 13.39% | +31.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.31% | 16.30% | +27.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.48% | 18.94% | +20.54% |
Dividends
AVGO vs. FTS - Dividend Comparison
AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than FTS's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 0.63% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.71% | 3.02% | 2.24% | 3.05% | 3.54% | 3.11% | 1.87% | 1.43% | 1.13% |
FTS Fortis Inc | 3.34% | 3.42% | 4.62% | 4.50% | 4.48% | 3.40% | 3.54% | 3.31% | 3.35% | 4.43% | 4.94% | 0.00% |
Financials
AVGO vs. FTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Broadcom Inc. and Fortis Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AVGO vs. FTS - Profitability Comparison
AVGO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.
FTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported a gross profit of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
AVGO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.
FTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported an operating income of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.
AVGO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.
FTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported a net income of 524.35M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGO and FTS have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVGO has higher volatility (20.09%) compared to FTS (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGO dropped -48.30% vs FTS's -34.36%.
FTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVGO and FTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer