PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGO vs. BIP-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AVGO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AVGO is traded in USD, while BIP-UN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BIP-UN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGO achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly higher than BIP-UN.TO's 13.82% return. Over the past 10 years, AVGO has outperformed BIP-UN.TO with an annualized return of 41.32%, while BIP-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 28.77% annualized return.


AVGO

1D
2.82%
1M
-7.77%
YTD
14.83%
6M
-0.72%
1Y
61.91%
3Y*
72.46%
5Y*
56.70%
10Y*
41.32%

BIP-UN.TO

1D
-0.39%
1M
6.39%
YTD
13.82%
6M
12.37%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
7.00%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
28.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
14.83%50.63%110.49%104.18%-13.27%56.48%44.88%29.05%2.18%48.19%
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
13.82%15.30%6.27%7.08%20.25%27.91%17.32%52.53%-17.94%42.93%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGO and BIP-UN.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2009

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AVGO:

$1.93T

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$24.85B

EPS

AVGO:

$6.01

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$0.91

PE Ratio

AVGO:

65.99

BIP-UN.TO:

59.66

PEG Ratio

AVGO:

0.82

BIP-UN.TO:

0.31

PS Ratio

AVGO:

25.64

BIP-UN.TO:

1.04

PB Ratio

AVGO:

22.05

BIP-UN.TO:

5.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

AVGO:

$75.47B

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$24.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AVGO:

$50.53B

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$6.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

AVGO:

$41.76B

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$11.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGO vs. BIP-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGO
AVGO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
AVGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

BIP-UN.TO
BIP-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVGOBIP-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.20

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

1.75

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.16

3.79

+1.37

AVGO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGO and BIP-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVGOBIP-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.15

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.32

0.45

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

0.74

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.90

+0.19

Drawdowns

AVGO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGO drawdown since its inception was -48.30%, smaller than the maximum BIP-UN.TO drawdown of -51.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGO and BIP-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGOBIP-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.30%

-51.41%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.67%

-12.06%

-16.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.15%

-41.17%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.15%

-47.89%

+6.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.30%

-51.41%

+3.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.64%

-1.52%

-16.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-7.80%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.03%

5.55%

+6.48%

Volatility

AVGO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a higher volatility of 20.09% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) at 4.78%. This indicates that AVGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIP-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGOBIP-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.09%

4.78%

+15.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.69%

14.26%

+20.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.31%

18.41%

+26.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.31%

33.34%

+9.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.48%

38.92%

+0.56%

Dividends

AVGO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than BIP-UN.TO's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.63%0.70%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
4.51%5.04%4.85%5.00%4.23%3.97%5.61%5.62%6.65%5.64%5.16%10.13%

Financials

AVGO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Broadcom Inc. and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
22.19B
6.30B
(AVGO) Total Revenue
(BIP-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AVGO values in USD, BIP-UN.TO values in CAD

AVGO vs. BIP-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Broadcom Inc. and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
67.2%
26.9%
Portfolio components
AVGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.

BIP-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a gross profit of 1.70B and revenue of 6.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.

AVGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.

BIP-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.

AVGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.

BIP-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVGO and BIP-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGO and BIP-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer