AVAV vs. CLS.TO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

AVAV (AeroVironment, Inc.) and CLS.TO (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. AVAV operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while CLS.TO operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, AVAV returned 19.16%/yr vs 43.13%/yr for CLS.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AVAV vs. CLS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) and Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

AVAV is traded in USD, while CLS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CLS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVAV achieves a -23.65% return, which is significantly lower than CLS.TO's 30.20% return. Over the past 10 years, AVAV has underperformed CLS.TO with an annualized return of 19.16%, while CLS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 43.13% annualized return.

AVAV

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 9.74%
• YTD: -23.65%
• 6M: -34.62%
• 1Y: -3.25%
• 3Y*: 23.54%
• 5Y*: 10.87%
• 10Y*: 19.16%

CLS.TO

• 1D: 3.51%
• 1M: 2.58%
• YTD: 30.20%
• 6M: 13.02%
• 1Y: 218.72%
• 3Y*: 209.37%
• 5Y*: 114.69%
• 10Y*: 43.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVAV vs. CLS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AVAV AeroVironment, Inc.	-23.65%	57.18%	22.10%	47.14%	38.09%	-28.62%	40.75%	-9.14%	20.99%	109.32%
CLS.TO Celestica Inc.	30.20%	220.69%	215.14%	160.52%	1.78%	37.36%	-2.32%	-6.08%	-16.29%	-11.14%

Correlation

The correlation between AVAV and CLS.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2007	0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap AVAV : $9.01B CLS.TO : CA$62.28B
EPS AVAV : -$4.63 CLS.TO : CA$8.28
PS Ratio AVAV : 7.51 CLS.TO : 4.52
PB Ratio AVAV : 2.11 CLS.TO : 29.68
Total Revenue (TTM) AVAV : $1.19B CLS.TO : CA$13.81B
Gross Profit (TTM) AVAV : $104.63M CLS.TO : CA$1.60B
EBITDA (TTM) AVAV : -$242.06M CLS.TO : CA$1.36B

Return for Risk

AVAV vs. CLS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVAV

AVAV Risk / Return Rank: 41
AVAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
AVAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
AVAV Omega Ratio Rank: 42
AVAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
AVAV Martin Ratio Rank: 40

CLS.TO

CLS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 93
CLS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CLS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
CLS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CLS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CLS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVAV vs. CLS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) and Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVAV	CLS.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.04	3.07	-3.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.48	2.95	-2.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.40	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.05	7.45	-7.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.10	18.87	-18.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVAV vs. CLS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVAV Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the CLS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVAV and CLS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVAV	CLS.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04	3.07	-3.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	2.04	-1.84
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	0.88	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.43	-0.19

Drawdowns

AVAV vs. CLS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVAV drawdown since its inception was -61.45%, smaller than the maximum CLS.TO drawdown of -80.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVAV and CLS.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVAV	CLS.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.45%	-80.63%	+19.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.45%	-29.56%	-31.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.45%	-53.42%	-8.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.45%	-53.42%	-8.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.45%	-80.63%	+19.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.94%	-18.17%	-36.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.56%	-26.18%	-2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.68%	11.65%	+22.03%

Volatility

AVAV vs. CLS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) is 24.99%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a volatility of 27.08%. This indicates that AVAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVAV	CLS.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.99%	27.08%	-2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.60%	55.16%	+3.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.83%	71.89%	+1.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.85%	56.76%	-0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.96%	49.36%	+2.60%

Dividends

AVAV vs. CLS.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither AVAV nor CLS.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVAV and CLS.TO in my portfolio?

AVAV and CLS.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.