PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AV.L vs. ABDN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AV.L vs. ABDN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Aviva plc (AV.L) and Abrdn plc (ABDN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AV.L achieves a -6.88% return, which is significantly lower than ABDN.L's 19.18% return. Over the past 10 years, AV.L has outperformed ABDN.L with an annualized return of 5.84%, while ABDN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.37% annualized return.


AV.L

1D
1.23%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
-6.88%
6M
-1.16%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
23.74%
5Y*
7.93%
10Y*
5.84%

ABDN.L

1D
-0.92%
1M
7.36%
YTD
19.18%
6M
25.02%
1Y
38.53%
3Y*
12.60%
5Y*
4.96%
10Y*
3.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AV.L vs. ABDN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AV.L
Aviva plc
-6.88%56.69%16.76%5.64%-18.84%30.80%-19.79%18.65%-22.84%8.48%
ABDN.L
Abrdn plc
19.18%57.94%-12.84%2.11%-14.88%-9.77%-5.36%38.83%-44.96%24.70%

Correlation

The correlation between AV.L and ABDN.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2009

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between AV.L and ABDN.L has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

AV.L:

£0.49

ABDN.L:

£0.70

PE Ratio

AV.L:

12.48

ABDN.L:

3.39

PEG Ratio

AV.L:

0.44

ABDN.L:

0.00

PS Ratio

AV.L:

0.24

ABDN.L:

0.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

AV.L:

£80.81B

ABDN.L:

£3.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AV.L:

£84.57B

ABDN.L:

£3.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

AV.L:

£2.85B

ABDN.L:

£796.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AV.L vs. ABDN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AV.L
AV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
AV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
AV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
AV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

ABDN.L
ABDN.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ABDN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AV.L vs. ABDN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aviva plc (AV.L) and Abrdn plc (ABDN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AV.LABDN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.26

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

2.60

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

7.62

-6.86

AV.L vs. ABDN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the ABDN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AV.L and ABDN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AV.LABDN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

1.34

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.15

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.10

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.13

+0.05

Drawdowns

AV.L vs. ABDN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AV.L drawdown since its inception was -59.13%, smaller than the maximum ABDN.L drawdown of -64.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AV.L and ABDN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AV.LABDN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.13%

-64.13%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-14.76%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.83%

-37.10%

+24.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.21%

-50.49%

+11.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.13%

-61.82%

+2.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.30%

-14.50%

+6.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.08%

-28.92%

+12.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

5.04%

+0.29%

Volatility

AV.L vs. ABDN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aviva plc (AV.L) is 5.46%, while Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) has a volatility of 8.11%. This indicates that AV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABDN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AV.LABDN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

8.11%

-2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.98%

23.85%

-7.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.18%

28.65%

-8.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.94%

32.62%

-6.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.65%

33.91%

-6.26%

Dividends

AV.L vs. ABDN.L - Dividend Comparison

AV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than ABDN.L's 6.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABDN.L
Abrdn plc
6.18%7.10%10.34%8.17%7.71%6.06%7.68%6.58%10.54%5.33%5.78%5.12%
AV.L
Aviva plc
6.44%5.39%8.25%7.33%29.52%3.96%3.03%5.48%5.74%3.64%2.56%2.12%

Financials

AV.L vs. ABDN.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aviva plc and Abrdn plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20212022202320242025
38.52B
1.04B
(AV.L) Total Revenue
(ABDN.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AV.L and ABDN.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AV.L and ABDN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer