AUTL vs. AEVA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

AUTL (Autolus Therapeutics plc) and AEVA (Aeva Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. AUTL operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while AEVA operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, AUTL returned -26.36%/yr vs -16.40%/yr for AEVA. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AUTL vs. AEVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL) and Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUTL achieves a -26.63% return, which is significantly lower than AEVA's 73.87% return.

AUTL

• 1D: -4.58%
• 1M: -7.01%
• YTD: -26.63%
• 6M: -8.18%
• 1Y: -37.61%
• 3Y*: -20.17%
• 5Y*: -26.36%
• 10Y*: —

AEVA

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 70.15%
• YTD: 73.87%
• 6M: 53.02%
• 1Y: 10.48%
• 3Y*: 49.22%
• 5Y*: -16.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUTL vs. AEVA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AUTL Autolus Therapeutics plc	-26.63%	-15.32%	-63.51%	238.95%	-63.39%	-41.95%	-3.77%
AEVA Aeva Technologies, Inc.	73.87%	179.58%	25.38%	-44.29%	-82.01%	-48.01%	51.46%

Correlation

The correlation between AUTL and AEVA is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2020	0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap AUTL : $388.57M AEVA : $1.45B
EPS AUTL : -$1.09 AEVA : -$2.52
PS Ratio AUTL : 4.20 AEVA : 63.51
Total Revenue (TTM) AUTL : $92.59M AEVA : $20.97M
Gross Profit (TTM) AUTL : -$10.36M AEVA : $971.00K
EBITDA (TTM) AUTL : -$253.48M AEVA : $21.17M

Return for Risk

AUTL vs. AEVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUTL

AUTL Risk / Return Rank: 22
AUTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
AUTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
AUTL Omega Ratio Rank: 24
AUTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
AUTL Martin Ratio Rank: 23

AEVA

AEVA Risk / Return Rank: 49
AEVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
AEVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
AEVA Omega Ratio Rank: 53
AEVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
AEVA Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUTL vs. AEVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL) and Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AUTL	AEVA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.50	0.09	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.37	1.00	-1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.12	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.69	0.14	-0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.96	0.19	-1.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AUTL vs. AEVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUTL Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the AEVA Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUTL and AEVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AUTL	AEVA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.50	0.09	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.34	-0.17	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.37	-0.12	-0.25

Drawdowns

AUTL vs. AEVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUTL drawdown since its inception was -97.63%, roughly equal to the maximum AEVA drawdown of -97.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUTL and AEVA.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUTL	AEVA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.63%	-97.71%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.85%	-75.68%	+20.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-84.36%	-75.68%	-8.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.68%	-96.02%	+10.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.96%	-76.91%	-20.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.27%	-70.68%	-10.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.02%	55.91%	-16.89%

Volatility

AUTL vs. AEVA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL) is 24.19%, while Aeva Technologies, Inc. (AEVA) has a volatility of 39.11%. This indicates that AUTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AUTL	AEVA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.19%	39.11%	-14.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.08%	78.74%	-26.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.46%	114.82%	-39.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	77.73%	97.00%	-19.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.85%	91.35%	-10.50%

Dividends

AUTL vs. AEVA - Dividend Comparison

Neither AUTL nor AEVA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AUTL and AEVA in my portfolio?

AUTL and AEVA have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AUTL or AEVA?

AEVA has higher volatility (39.11%) compared to AUTL (24.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUTL dropped -97.63% vs AEVA's -97.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AEVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.