AU vs. ERAS
AU (AngloGold Ashanti Limited) and ERAS (Erasca, Inc.) are both stocks. AU operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while ERAS operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 3 years, AU returned 56.64%/yr vs 63.40%/yr for ERAS. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AU vs. ERAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AU achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly lower than ERAS's 245.97% return.
AU
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -20.12%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 93.94%
- 3Y*
- 56.64%
- 5Y*
- 34.89%
- 10Y*
- 19.78%
ERAS
- 1D
- 7.52%
- 1M
- 27.17%
- YTD
- 245.97%
- 6M
- 285.33%
- 1Y
- 704.37%
- 3Y*
- 63.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AU vs. ERAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AU AngloGold Ashanti Limited | 1.94% | 288.18% | 25.43% | -2.68% | -5.09% | 7.61% |
ERAS Erasca, Inc. | 245.97% | 48.21% | 17.84% | -50.58% | -72.34% | -10.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between AU and ERAS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2021 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
AU:
$42.65B
ERAS:
$3.92B
AU:
$6.85
ERAS:
-$0.96
AU:
5.00
ERAS:
9.95
AU:
$11.17B
ERAS:
$0.00
AU:
$5.82B
ERAS:
-$743.00K
AU:
$5.58B
ERAS:
-$279.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AU vs. ERAS — Risk / Return Rank
AU
ERAS
AU vs. ERAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AU) and Erasca, Inc. (ERAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AU | ERAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.66 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 11.96 | -9.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.04 | 38.13 | -31.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AU | ERAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 6.83 | -5.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | -0.07 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
AU vs. ERAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AU drawdown since its inception was -90.12%, smaller than the maximum ERAS drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AU and ERAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AU | ERAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.12% | -95.65% | +5.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.59% | -59.46% | +22.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.71% | -67.68% | +28.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.22% | -47.12% | +14.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.08% | -74.82% | +28.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.40% | 18.61% | -5.21% |
Volatility
AU vs. ERAS - Volatility Comparison
AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AU) and Erasca, Inc. (ERAS) have volatilities of 20.03% and 20.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AU | ERAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.03% | 20.75% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.74% | 96.00% | -50.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.81% | 104.32% | -46.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.98% | 83.42% | -34.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.72% | 83.42% | -33.70% |
Dividends
AU vs. ERAS - Dividend Comparison
AU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, while ERAS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AU AngloGold Ashanti Limited | 5.45% | 2.96% | 1.78% | 1.14% | 2.26% | 2.58% | 0.49% | 0.30% | 0.48% | 0.93% |
ERAS Erasca, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AU vs. ERAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AngloGold Ashanti Limited and Erasca, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AU and ERAS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ERAS has higher volatility (20.75%) compared to AU (20.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AU dropped -90.12% vs ERAS's -95.65%.
ERAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.83 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AU and ERAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer