PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATRL.TO vs. BHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATRL.TO vs. BHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO) and BHP Group (BHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ATRL.TO is traded in CAD, while BHP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BHP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATRL.TO achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than BHP's 43.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ATRL.TO has underperformed BHP with an annualized return of 5.33%, while BHP has yielded a comparatively higher 23.06% annualized return.


ATRL.TO

1D
1.11%
1M
-11.19%
YTD
-8.64%
6M
-8.48%
1Y
-13.36%
3Y*
34.59%
5Y*
20.51%
10Y*
5.33%

BHP

1D
1.46%
1M
0.85%
YTD
43.95%
6M
47.46%
1Y
79.52%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
18.10%
10Y*
23.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATRL.TO vs. BHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATRL.TO
SNC-Lavalin Group Inc
-8.64%16.29%79.01%79.18%-22.57%42.60%-27.19%-34.23%-17.75%0.73%
BHP
BHP Group
43.95%23.02%-18.26%13.73%53.49%0.86%22.39%19.37%19.85%24.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ATRL.TO and BHP is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.33

The correlation between ATRL.TO and BHP shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATRL.TO:

CA$13.36B

BHP:

$212.97B

EPS

ATRL.TO:

CA$15.83

BHP:

$8.51

PE Ratio

ATRL.TO:

5.11

BHP:

9.84

PEG Ratio

ATRL.TO:

0.01

BHP:

2.72

PS Ratio

ATRL.TO:

1.19

BHP:

1.98

PB Ratio

ATRL.TO:

2.47

BHP:

4.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATRL.TO:

CA$11.43B

BHP:

$107.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATRL.TO:

CA$884.72M

BHP:

$89.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATRL.TO:

CA$3.55B

BHP:

$52.23B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATRL.TO vs. BHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATRL.TO
ATRL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
ATRL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATRL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATRL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ATRL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATRL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

BHP
BHP Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
BHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHP Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATRL.TO vs. BHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO) and BHP Group (BHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATRL.TOBHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.39

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

4.12

-4.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.14

15.57

-16.71

ATRL.TO vs. BHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATRL.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the BHP Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATRL.TO and BHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATRL.TOBHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

2.52

-2.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.55

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

0.70

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.40

-0.23

Drawdowns

ATRL.TO vs. BHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATRL.TO drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, which is greater than BHP's maximum drawdown of -66.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATRL.TO and BHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATRL.TOBHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.02%

-66.03%

-7.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.44%

-19.40%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.85%

-32.25%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.72%

-32.25%

-10.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.02%

-41.57%

-32.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.60%

-9.46%

-14.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.86%

-17.32%

-7.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.75%

5.12%

+6.63%

Volatility

ATRL.TO vs. BHP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO) is 10.50%, while BHP Group (BHP) has a volatility of 12.81%. This indicates that ATRL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATRL.TOBHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.50%

12.81%

-2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.40%

26.02%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.48%

31.74%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.52%

32.82%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.03%

32.94%

+5.09%

Dividends

ATRL.TO vs. BHP - Dividend Comparison

ATRL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than BHP's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATRL.TO
SNC-Lavalin Group Inc
0.10%0.09%0.10%0.19%0.34%0.26%0.37%0.80%2.50%1.91%1.80%2.43%
BHP
BHP Group
3.18%3.64%5.98%4.98%22.44%9.98%3.67%8.59%4.89%3.61%1.68%9.38%

Financials

ATRL.TO vs. BHP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SNC-Lavalin Group Inc and BHP Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
3.00B
27.95B
(ATRL.TO) Total Revenue
(BHP) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ATRL.TO values in CAD, BHP values in USD

ATRL.TO vs. BHP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SNC-Lavalin Group Inc and BHP Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
7.1%
42.9%
Portfolio components
ATRL.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SNC-Lavalin Group Inc reported a gross profit of 214.09M and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.1%.

BHP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group reported a gross profit of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.

ATRL.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SNC-Lavalin Group Inc reported an operating income of 178.37M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

BHP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group reported an operating income of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.9%.

ATRL.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SNC-Lavalin Group Inc reported a net income of 92.81M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

BHP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATRL.TO and BHP have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATRL.TO and BHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer