PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATEYY vs. ERAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATEYY vs. ERAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY) and Erasca, Inc. (ERAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATEYY achieves a 31.02% return, which is significantly lower than ERAS's 245.97% return.


ATEYY

1D
7.82%
1M
-16.54%
YTD
31.02%
6M
27.11%
1Y
199.81%
3Y*
73.30%
5Y*
49.34%
10Y*
51.21%

ERAS

1D
7.52%
1M
27.17%
YTD
245.97%
6M
285.33%
1Y
704.37%
3Y*
63.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATEYY vs. ERAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ATEYY
Advantest Corp DRC
31.02%122.70%68.99%111.43%-33.43%14.64%
ERAS
Erasca, Inc.
245.97%48.21%17.84%-50.58%-72.34%-10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ATEYY and ERAS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2021

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATEYY:

$120.75B

ERAS:

$3.92B

EPS

ATEYY:

$520.21

ERAS:

-$0.96

PB Ratio

ATEYY:

0.15

ERAS:

9.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATEYY:

$1.14T

ERAS:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATEYY:

$736.09B

ERAS:

-$743.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

ATEYY:

$533.69B

ERAS:

-$279.47M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATEYY vs. ERAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATEYY
ATEYY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ATEYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATEYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATEYY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ATEYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATEYY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ERAS
ERAS Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ERAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERAS Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ERAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERAS Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATEYY vs. ERAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY) and Erasca, Inc. (ERAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATEYYERASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.66

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.05

11.96

-5.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.62

38.13

-21.51

ATEYY vs. ERAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATEYY Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is lower than the ERAS Sharpe Ratio of 6.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATEYY and ERAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATEYYERASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96

6.83

-3.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

-0.07

+1.20

Drawdowns

ATEYY vs. ERAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATEYY drawdown since its inception was -56.48%, smaller than the maximum ERAS drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATEYY and ERAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATEYYERASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.48%

-95.65%

+39.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.24%

-59.46%

+26.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.70%

-67.68%

+22.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.54%

-47.12%

+30.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.23%

-74.82%

+60.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.08%

18.61%

-6.53%

Volatility

ATEYY vs. ERAS - Volatility Comparison

Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY) has a higher volatility of 21.85% compared to Erasca, Inc. (ERAS) at 20.75%. This indicates that ATEYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATEYYERASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.85%

20.75%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.89%

96.00%

-44.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.01%

104.32%

-36.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.61%

83.42%

-30.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.23%

83.42%

-35.19%

Dividends

ATEYY vs. ERAS - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATEYY nor ERAS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ATEYY
Advantest Corp DRC
0.00%0.11%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.18%1.24%
ERAS
Erasca, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ATEYY vs. ERAS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Advantest Corp DRC and Erasca, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B300.00B350.00B20222023202420252026
334.10B
0
(ATEYY) Total Revenue
(ERAS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ATEYY and ERAS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATEYY has higher volatility (21.85%) compared to ERAS (20.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATEYY dropped -56.48% vs ERAS's -95.65%.

ERAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.83 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATEYY and ERAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer