ASWC.DE vs. HLMA.L
ASWC.DE (HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR) is Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the EQM Future of Defence Index, while HLMA.L (Halma plc) is a stock. Over the past year, ASWC.DE returned 16.04% vs 55.56% for HLMA.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASWC.DE vs. HLMA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ASWC.DE is traded in EUR, while HLMA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HLMA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASWC.DE achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly lower than HLMA.L's 34.73% return.
ASWC.DE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 8.64%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HLMA.L
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 34.73%
- 6M
- 30.97%
- 1Y
- 55.56%
- 3Y*
- 25.59%
- 5Y*
- 12.85%
- 10Y*
- 17.29%
ASWC.DE vs. HLMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ASWC.DE HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 13.04% | 38.30% | 39.36% | 14.35% |
HLMA.L Halma plc | 34.73% | 25.61% | 24.43% | 2.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASWC.DE and HLMA.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2023 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASWC.DE vs. HLMA.L — Risk / Return Rank
ASWC.DE
HLMA.L
ASWC.DE vs. HLMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) and Halma plc (HLMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASWC.DE | HLMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.38 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 4.40 | -3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 16.56 | -13.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASWC.DE | HLMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 2.18 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.91 | 0.63 | +1.28 |
Drawdowns
ASWC.DE vs. HLMA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASWC.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.58%, smaller than the maximum HLMA.L drawdown of -51.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASWC.DE and HLMA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASWC.DE | HLMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.58% | -51.88% | +39.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.58% | -12.56% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.83% | -3.19% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -11.63% | +9.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.51% | 3.34% | +2.17% |
Volatility
ASWC.DE vs. HLMA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) is 5.89%, while Halma plc (HLMA.L) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that ASWC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASWC.DE | HLMA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 8.79% | -2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.89% | 20.03% | -4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.35% | 25.44% | -5.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 26.70% | -7.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 25.85% | -6.73% |
Dividends
ASWC.DE vs. HLMA.L - Dividend Comparison
ASWC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HLMA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASWC.DE HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HLMA.L Halma plc | 0.50% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.91% | 0.98% | 0.57% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.11% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASWC.DE and HLMA.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ASWC.DE and HLMA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer