PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASML.AS vs. JNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ASML.AS vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ASML.AS is traded in EUR, while JNJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JNJ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASML.AS achieves a 63.16% return, which is significantly higher than JNJ's 15.96% return. Over the past 10 years, ASML.AS has outperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 33.95%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively lower 9.83% annualized return.


ASML.AS

1D
0.86%
1M
13.54%
YTD
63.16%
6M
56.08%
1Y
126.18%
3Y*
31.56%
5Y*
22.96%
10Y*
33.95%

JNJ

1D
0.00%
1M
8.21%
YTD
15.96%
6M
17.91%
1Y
52.20%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASML.AS vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASML.AS
ASML Holding NV
63.16%37.08%0.36%36.66%-27.83%78.74%52.10%95.32%-4.67%37.45%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
15.52%29.98%1.47%-11.32%12.54%19.77%1.69%18.85%-0.68%9.13%

Correlation

The correlation between ASML.AS and JNJ is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.13

The correlation between ASML.AS and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (3 years) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASML.AS vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASML.AS
ASML.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ASML.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASML.AS vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASML.ASJNJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.53

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.17

4.49

+3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.20

14.12

+7.08

ASML.AS vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASML.AS Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is comparable to the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASML.AS and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASML.ASJNJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23

3.06

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.65

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.51

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.61

-0.07

Drawdowns

ASML.AS vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASML.AS drawdown since its inception was -89.99%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -27.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML.AS and JNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASML.ASJNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.99%

-27.10%

-62.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.81%

-11.68%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.77%

-18.03%

-26.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.93%

-20.88%

-27.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.93%

-25.51%

-22.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.43%

+4.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.58%

-7.02%

-25.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.13%

3.71%

+2.42%

Volatility

ASML.AS vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS) has a higher volatility of 13.42% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 6.31%. This indicates that ASML.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASML.ASJNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.42%

6.31%

+7.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.65%

12.91%

+17.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.95%

17.20%

+22.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.44%

17.64%

+20.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.12%

19.39%

+14.73%

Dividends

ASML.AS vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

ASML.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than JNJ's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML.AS
ASML Holding NV
0.50%0.71%0.92%0.87%1.28%0.47%0.64%1.19%1.02%0.83%0.98%0.85%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.26%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%

Financials

ASML.AS vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASML Holding NV and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ASML.AS values in EUR, JNJ values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ASML.AS and JNJ have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASML.AS and JNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer