ARKQ vs. CGDV
ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKQ is a Robotics fund actively managed by ARK, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ARKQ returned 35.12%/yr vs 24.27%/yr for CGDV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.
Performance
ARKQ vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 14.84% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's 10.15% return.
ARKQ
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- 14.84%
- 6M
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- 63.19%
- 3Y*
- 35.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 21.93%
CGDV
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKQ vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 14.84% | 48.81% | 33.88% | 40.70% | -31.74% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 10.15% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKQ and CGDV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between ARKQ and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
ARKQ vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKQ
CGDV
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
ARKQ
CGDV
Technology
ARKQ
CGDV
Consumer Cyclical
ARKQ
CGDV
Communication Services
ARKQ
CGDV
Energy
ARKQ
CGDV
Healthcare
ARKQ
CGDV
Utilities
ARKQ
CGDV
Basic Materials
ARKQ
-
CGDV
Consumer Defensive
ARKQ
-
CGDV
Financial Services
ARKQ
-
CGDV
Real Estate
ARKQ
-
CGDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKQ vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank
ARKQ
CGDV
ARKQ vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKQ | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.44 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 2.84 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | 13.37 | -4.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKQ | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 2.34 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.21 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
ARKQ vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and CGDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKQ | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.89% | -21.82% | -38.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.58% | -9.75% | -10.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.76% | -14.28% | -16.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.44% | -2.22% | -6.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.23% | -3.61% | -13.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.83% | 2.07% | +4.76% |
Volatility
ARKQ vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a higher volatility of 11.77% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 3.60%. This indicates that ARKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKQ | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.77% | 3.60% | +8.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.39% | 9.47% | +15.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.13% | 11.85% | +21.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.39% | 15.51% | +16.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.93% | 15.51% | +14.42% |
ARKQ vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKQ vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison
ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than CGDV's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.19% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKQ and CGDV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKQ has higher volatility (11.77%) compared to CGDV (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKQ dropped -59.89% vs CGDV's -21.82%.
On 3-year performance, ARKQ leads with 35.12% vs 24.27% for CGDV. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 35.12% return vs 24.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.
CGDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.23% for ARKQ.
ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.33% for CGDV.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKQ and CGDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer