PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKQ vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKQ vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 14.84% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's 10.15% return.


ARKQ

1D
1.60%
1M
-2.37%
YTD
14.84%
6M
15.09%
1Y
63.19%
3Y*
35.12%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
21.93%

CGDV

1D
0.13%
1M
1.46%
YTD
10.15%
6M
10.88%
1Y
27.58%
3Y*
24.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKQ vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
14.84%48.81%33.88%40.70%-31.74%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
10.15%25.50%20.10%28.81%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKQ and CGDV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.74

The correlation between ARKQ and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARKQ vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARKQ
CGDV

Industrials

40.2%
13.2%

Technology

33.1%
34.1%

Consumer Cyclical

14.1%
10.6%

Communication Services

8.7%
8.4%

Energy

1.6%
3.8%

Healthcare

1.1%
11.5%

Utilities

1.1%
2.1%

Basic Materials

-

2.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.5%

Financial Services

-

6.8%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Industrials

ARKQ
40.2%
CGDV
13.2%

Technology

ARKQ
33.1%
CGDV
34.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ARKQ
14.1%
CGDV
10.6%

Communication Services

ARKQ
8.7%
CGDV
8.4%

Energy

ARKQ
1.6%
CGDV
3.8%

Healthcare

ARKQ
1.1%
CGDV
11.5%

Utilities

ARKQ
1.1%
CGDV
2.1%

Basic Materials

ARKQ

-

CGDV
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

ARKQ

-

CGDV
5.5%

Financial Services

ARKQ

-

CGDV
6.8%

Real Estate

ARKQ

-

CGDV
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKQ vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKQ
ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKQ vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARKQCGDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.44

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

2.84

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

13.37

-4.10

ARKQ vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKQ and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARKQCGDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.34

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

1.21

-0.57

Drawdowns

ARKQ vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and CGDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKQCGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.89%

-21.82%

-38.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.58%

-9.75%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.76%

-14.28%

-16.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.44%

-2.22%

-6.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.23%

-3.61%

-13.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.83%

2.07%

+4.76%

Volatility

ARKQ vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a higher volatility of 11.77% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 3.60%. This indicates that ARKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKQCGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.77%

3.60%

+8.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.39%

9.47%

+15.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.13%

11.85%

+21.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.39%

15.51%

+16.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.93%

15.51%

+14.42%

ARKQ vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKQ vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than CGDV's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.23%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.80%0.86%0.00%2.86%1.54%0.00%0.98%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.19%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKQ and CGDV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKQ has higher volatility (11.77%) compared to CGDV (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKQ dropped -59.89% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

On 3-year performance, ARKQ leads with 35.12% vs 24.27% for CGDV. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 35.12% return vs 24.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.

CGDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.23% for ARKQ.

ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.33% for CGDV.

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKQ and CGDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer