PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKK vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKK vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKK achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKK has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 15.39%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.53% annualized return.


ARKK

1D
1.87%
1M
-4.10%
YTD
-1.35%
6M
-7.42%
1Y
24.13%
3Y*
21.64%
5Y*
-7.38%
10Y*
15.39%

SCHG

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
3.75%
6M
2.93%
1Y
20.82%
3Y*
24.03%
5Y*
14.90%
10Y*
18.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKK vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
-1.35%35.49%8.40%69.04%-66.97%-23.60%152.71%35.08%3.52%87.33%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
3.75%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKK and SCHG is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2014

0.74

The correlation between ARKK and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARKK vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARKK
SCHG

Healthcare

27.4%
7.7%

Technology

26.4%
46.3%

Financial Services

15.4%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.7%
12.7%

Communication Services

10.9%
16.0%

Industrials

6.3%
5.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.7%

Energy

-

0.8%

Real Estate

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Healthcare

ARKK
27.4%
SCHG
7.7%

Technology

ARKK
26.4%
SCHG
46.3%

Financial Services

ARKK
15.4%
SCHG
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ARKK
13.7%
SCHG
12.7%

Communication Services

ARKK
10.9%
SCHG
16.0%

Industrials

ARKK
6.3%
SCHG
5.8%

Basic Materials

ARKK

-

SCHG
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

ARKK

-

SCHG
1.7%

Energy

ARKK

-

SCHG
0.8%

Real Estate

ARKK

-

SCHG
0.5%

Utilities

ARKK

-

SCHG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKK vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKK
ARKK Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ARKK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKK Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKK Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKK vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARKKSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.24

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

1.27

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.71

4.25

-2.54

ARKK vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKK Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKK and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARKKSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

1.33

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.67

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.86

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.83

-0.49

Drawdowns

ARKK vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKK drawdown since its inception was -80.97%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKK and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKKSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.97%

-34.59%

-46.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.35%

-16.41%

-14.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.56%

-23.39%

-16.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.23%

-34.59%

-42.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.97%

-34.59%

-46.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.87%

-4.25%

-46.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.14%

-5.20%

-24.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.18%

4.91%

+9.27%

Volatility

ARKK vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) has a higher volatility of 11.34% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.52%. This indicates that ARKK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKKSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.34%

4.52%

+6.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.96%

12.02%

+13.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.15%

15.77%

+20.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.38%

22.31%

+24.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.34%

21.58%

+18.76%

ARKK vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKK vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

ARKK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.70%0.00%0.55%1.64%0.38%3.14%1.32%0.00%2.27%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.37%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKK and SCHG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKK has higher volatility (11.34%) compared to SCHG (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKK dropped -80.97% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.53% vs 15.39% for ARKK. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.53% return vs 15.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKK.

SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for ARKK.

ARKK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKK and 0.04% for SCHG.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKK and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer