PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARES vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARES vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARES achieves a -20.44% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's -3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, ARES has outperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 29.88%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively lower 13.14% annualized return.


ARES

1D
0.97%
1M
0.49%
YTD
-20.44%
6M
-20.82%
1Y
-24.22%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
20.40%
10Y*
29.88%

BRK-B

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.32%
YTD
-3.11%
6M
-2.06%
1Y
-1.32%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARES vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
-20.44%-5.72%52.68%79.52%-12.75%77.75%37.37%110.13%-5.54%10.72%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-3.11%10.89%27.09%15.46%3.31%28.95%2.37%10.93%3.01%21.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ARES and BRK-B is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2014

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between ARES and BRK-B has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

ARES:

$2.83

BRK-B:

$33.62

PE Ratio

ARES:

44.81

BRK-B:

14.49

PEG Ratio

ARES:

1.79

BRK-B:

0.56

PS Ratio

ARES:

4.43

BRK-B:

2.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARES:

$6.31B

BRK-B:

$375.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARES:

$4.46B

BRK-B:

$94.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

ARES:

$2.42B

BRK-B:

$71.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARES vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARES
ARES Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ARES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARES Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ARES Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARES Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARES vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARESBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.00

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

-0.14

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

-0.30

-0.69

ARES vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARES Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARES and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARESBRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.59

-0.09

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.65

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.68

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.48

+0.15

Drawdowns

ARES vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARES drawdown since its inception was -49.73%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARES and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARESBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.73%

-53.86%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.05%

-9.42%

-39.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.73%

-14.95%

-34.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.73%

-26.58%

-23.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.73%

-29.57%

-20.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.01%

-9.78%

-23.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.31%

-11.07%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.72%

4.49%

+20.23%

Volatility

ARES vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

Ares Management Corporation (ARES) has a higher volatility of 11.35% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.98%. This indicates that ARES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARESBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.35%

3.98%

+7.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.50%

10.87%

+24.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.16%

14.38%

+26.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.33%

17.13%

+20.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.69%

19.44%

+17.25%

Dividends

ARES vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

ARES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
4.38%3.29%2.10%2.59%3.57%2.31%3.40%3.59%7.50%5.65%4.32%6.81%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ARES vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ares Management Corporation and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
1.53B
93.68B
(ARES) Total Revenue
(BRK-B) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ARES vs. BRK-B - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ares Management Corporation and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
96.1%
28.8%
Portfolio components
ARES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.1%.

BRK-B - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.98B and revenue of 93.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.

ARES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported an operating income of 364.95M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

BRK-B - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported an operating income of 15.05B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

ARES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a net income of 142.59M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.

BRK-B - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a net income of 10.18B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ARES and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARES has higher volatility (11.35%) compared to BRK-B (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARES dropped -49.73% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.

BRK-B currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARES and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer