PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARA.TO vs. HYMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARA.TO vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Aclara Resources Inc. (ARA.TO) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ARA.TO is traded in CAD, while HYMC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYMC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARA.TO achieves a 95.83% return, which is significantly higher than HYMC's 12.79% return.


ARA.TO

1D
0.71%
1M
-14.72%
YTD
95.83%
6M
69.20%
1Y
345.26%
3Y*
106.55%
5Y*
10Y*

HYMC

1D
-0.10%
1M
-30.08%
YTD
12.79%
6M
135.27%
1Y
519.01%
3Y*
104.69%
5Y*
-3.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARA.TO vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ARA.TO
Aclara Resources Inc.
95.83%380.00%-10.00%56.25%-77.78%-10.00%
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
12.79%926.46%-2.16%-55.05%-7.80%-9.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ARA.TO and HYMC is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARA.TO:

CA$932.94M

HYMC:

$2.36B

EPS

ARA.TO:

-CA$0.05

HYMC:

-$1.64

PB Ratio

ARA.TO:

6.15

HYMC:

10.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARA.TO:

CA$0.00

HYMC:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARA.TO:

-CA$1.03M

HYMC:

-$4.65M

EBITDA (TTM)

ARA.TO:

-CA$9.35M

HYMC:

-$69.17M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARA.TO vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARA.TO
ARA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ARA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ARA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

HYMC
HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARA.TO vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aclara Resources Inc. (ARA.TO) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARA.TOHYMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.45

10.10

-3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.69

23.34

-9.65

ARA.TO vs. HYMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is comparable to the HYMC Sharpe Ratio of 4.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARA.TO and HYMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARA.TOHYMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11

4.39

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

-0.11

+0.38

Drawdowns

ARA.TO vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARA.TO drawdown since its inception was -84.38%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARA.TO and HYMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARA.TOHYMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.38%

-98.84%

+14.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.93%

-51.81%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.93%

-61.75%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.97%

-82.50%

+63.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.14%

-63.73%

+6.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.37%

22.39%

+2.98%

Volatility

ARA.TO vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aclara Resources Inc. (ARA.TO) is 21.67%, while Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a volatility of 26.13%. This indicates that ARA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARA.TOHYMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.67%

26.13%

-4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.42%

95.04%

-31.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

111.97%

119.55%

-7.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.47%

152.65%

-61.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.47%

123.19%

-31.72%

Dividends

ARA.TO vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARA.TO nor HYMC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ARA.TO vs. HYMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aclara Resources Inc. and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M2022202320242025202600
(ARA.TO) Total Revenue
(HYMC) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ARA.TO values in CAD, HYMC values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ARA.TO and HYMC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARA.TO and HYMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer