ARA.TO vs. GDX
ARA.TO (Aclara Resources Inc.) is a stock, while GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) is Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Over the past 3 years, ARA.TO returned 106.55%/yr vs 39.87%/yr for GDX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARA.TO vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ARA.TO is traded in CAD, while GDX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GDX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARA.TO achieves a 95.83% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -6.61% return.
ARA.TO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -14.72%
- YTD
- 95.83%
- 6M
- 69.20%
- 1Y
- 345.26%
- 3Y*
- 106.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -15.10%
- YTD
- -6.61%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 56.63%
- 3Y*
- 39.87%
- 5Y*
- 20.63%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
ARA.TO vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARA.TO Aclara Resources Inc. | 95.83% | 380.00% | -10.00% | 56.25% | -77.78% | -10.00% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -6.61% | 143.14% | 20.00% | 7.36% | -3.24% | 7.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARA.TO and GDX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021 | 0.14 |
The correlation between ARA.TO and GDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARA.TO vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
ARA.TO
GDX
ARA.TO vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aclara Resources Inc. (ARA.TO) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARA.TO | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.23 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.45 | 1.85 | +4.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.69 | 4.64 | +9.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARA.TO | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.11 | 1.23 | +1.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.15 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
ARA.TO vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARA.TO drawdown since its inception was -84.38%, which is greater than GDX's maximum drawdown of -72.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARA.TO and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARA.TO | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.38% | -72.57% | -11.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.93% | -30.79% | -23.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.93% | -30.79% | -23.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.97% | -30.75% | +11.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.14% | -31.57% | -25.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.37% | 12.23% | +13.14% |
Volatility
ARA.TO vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
Aclara Resources Inc. (ARA.TO) has a higher volatility of 21.67% compared to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at 16.18%. This indicates that ARA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARA.TO | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.67% | 16.18% | +5.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.42% | 38.79% | +24.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 111.97% | 46.43% | +65.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.47% | 37.05% | +54.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.47% | 37.79% | +53.68% |
Dividends
ARA.TO vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
ARA.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARA.TO Aclara Resources Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARA.TO and GDX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ARA.TO and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer