APO vs. NMR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

APO (Apollo Global Management, Inc.) and NMR (Nomura Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — APO in Asset Management, NMR in Capital Markets. Over the past 10 years, APO returned 28.04%/yr vs 10.27%/yr for NMR. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

APO vs. NMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APO achieves a -11.14% return, which is significantly lower than NMR's 2.26% return. Over the past 10 years, APO has outperformed NMR with an annualized return of 28.04%, while NMR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.27% annualized return.

APO

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -3.82%
• YTD: -11.14%
• 6M: -6.37%
• 1Y: -2.88%
• 3Y*: 22.38%
• 5Y*: 19.80%
• 10Y*: 28.04%

NMR

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: 7.92%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 10.00%
• 1Y: 40.79%
• 3Y*: 37.17%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 10.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APO vs. NMR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc.	-11.14%	-11.12%	79.87%	49.44%	-9.59%	53.25%	8.00%	106.46%	-22.03%	85.29%
NMR Nomura Holdings, Inc.	2.26%	54.10%	34.05%	21.84%	-10.28%	-18.76%	4.39%	38.71%	-36.08%	0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between APO and NMR is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011	0.33

Fundamentals

Market Cap APO : $75.90B NMR : $26.11B
EPS APO : $3.58 NMR : $118.76
PE Ratio APO : 35.61 NMR : 0.07
PEG Ratio APO : 0.09 NMR : 0.00
PS Ratio APO : 2.58 NMR : 0.01
PB Ratio APO : 4.09 NMR : 0.01
Total Revenue (TTM) APO : $29.68B NMR : $4.76T
Gross Profit (TTM) APO : $26.52B NMR : $2.17T
EBITDA (TTM) APO : $9.28B NMR : $608.09B

Return for Risk

APO vs. NMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APO

APO Risk / Return Rank: 37
APO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
APO Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
APO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
APO Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
APO Martin Ratio Rank: 39

NMR

NMR Risk / Return Rank: 76
NMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
NMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
NMR Omega Ratio Rank: 74
NMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
NMR Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APO vs. NMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APO	NMR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	1.39	-1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.13	1.94	-1.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.25	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.08	1.83	-1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.17	4.67	-4.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APO vs. NMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APO Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the NMR Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APO and NMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APO	NMR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08	1.39	-1.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.44	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	0.34	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	-0.00	+0.58

Drawdowns

APO vs. NMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APO drawdown since its inception was -56.99%, smaller than the maximum NMR drawdown of -89.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APO and NMR.

Drawdown Indicators

	APO	NMR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.99%	-89.27%	+32.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.97%	-22.43%	-12.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.82%	-26.34%	-16.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.82%	-42.87%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.48%	-55.34%	+1.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.97%	-57.85%	+30.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.37%	-61.51%	+45.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.62%	8.77%	+7.85%

Volatility

APO vs. NMR - Volatility Comparison

Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) has a higher volatility of 8.60% compared to Nomura Holdings, Inc. (NMR) at 6.72%. This indicates that APO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APO	NMR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.60%	6.72%	+1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.16%	22.62%	+4.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.27%	29.56%	+5.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.07%	29.68%	+7.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.82%	30.71%	+7.11%

Dividends

APO vs. NMR - Dividend Comparison

APO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than NMR's 2.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc.	1.64%	1.38%	1.10%	1.81%	2.51%	2.90%	4.72%	4.23%	7.86%	5.53%	6.46%	12.91%
NMR Nomura Holdings, Inc.	2.03%	4.91%	4.29%	1.20%	3.86%	0.00%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	1.70%	1.79%	3.34%

Financials

APO vs. NMR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Nomura Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

APO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.93B and revenue of 4.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

NMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nomura Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 723.15B and revenue of 1.36T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.2%.

APO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 330.00M and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

NMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nomura Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 107.67B and revenue of 1.36T, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

APO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a net income of -1.91B and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in a net margin of -38.7%.

NMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nomura Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 73.93B and revenue of 1.36T, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APO and NMR in my portfolio?

APO and NMR have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APO or NMR?

APO has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to NMR (6.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APO dropped -56.99% vs NMR's -89.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.