PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APO vs. AM.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APO vs. AM.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and Dassault Aviation SA (AM.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

APO is traded in USD, while AM.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AM.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APO achieves a -11.14% return, which is significantly lower than AM.PA's 8.83% return. Over the past 10 years, APO has outperformed AM.PA with an annualized return of 28.04%, while AM.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 18.85% annualized return.


APO

1D
-0.36%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
-11.14%
6M
-6.37%
1Y
-2.88%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
19.80%
10Y*
28.04%

AM.PA

1D
0.00%
1M
2.41%
YTD
8.83%
6M
11.39%
1Y
-2.53%
3Y*
26.45%
5Y*
24.26%
10Y*
18.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APO vs. AM.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
-11.14%-11.12%79.87%49.44%-9.59%53.25%8.00%106.46%-22.03%85.29%
AM.PA
Dassault Aviation SA
8.83%59.93%4.93%18.88%59.08%12.93%-16.55%14.16%-2.09%53.39%

Correlation

The correlation between APO and AM.PA is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2011

0.15

The correlation between APO and AM.PA shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.17 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APO vs. AM.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APO
APO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
APO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
APO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
APO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
APO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

AM.PA
AM.PA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AM.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AM.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AM.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AM.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AM.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APO vs. AM.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and Dassault Aviation SA (AM.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APOAM.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.03

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

-0.02

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.17

-0.05

-0.12

APO vs. AM.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APO Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the AM.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APO and AM.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APOAM.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

-0.02

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.78

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.60

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.53

+0.05

Drawdowns

APO vs. AM.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APO drawdown since its inception was -56.99%, roughly equal to the maximum AM.PA drawdown of -58.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APO and AM.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APOAM.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.99%

-58.61%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.97%

-21.79%

-13.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.82%

-22.11%

-20.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.82%

-35.72%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.48%

-58.61%

+5.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.97%

-15.94%

-11.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-13.75%

-2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.62%

10.37%

+6.25%

Volatility

APO vs. AM.PA - Volatility Comparison

Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and Dassault Aviation SA (AM.PA) have volatilities of 8.60% and 8.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APOAM.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.60%

8.22%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.16%

25.20%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.27%

32.03%

+3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.07%

30.49%

+6.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.82%

31.05%

+6.77%

Dividends

APO vs. AM.PA - Dividend Comparison

APO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than AM.PA's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AM.PA
Dassault Aviation SA
1.59%1.72%1.71%1.67%1.57%12.95%0.00%18.12%12.64%9.32%11.40%8.72%
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
1.64%1.38%1.10%1.81%2.51%2.90%4.72%4.23%7.86%5.53%6.46%12.91%

Financials

APO vs. AM.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Dassault Aviation SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. APO values in USD, AM.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


APO and AM.PA have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APO and AM.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer