PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APLD vs. CRVS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APLD vs. CRVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) and Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APLD achieves a 66.99% return, which is significantly higher than CRVS's 44.81% return. Over the past 10 years, APLD has outperformed CRVS with an annualized return of 120.60%, while CRVS has yielded a comparatively lower -1.39% annualized return.


APLD

1D
3.34%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
66.99%
6M
27.51%
1Y
195.42%
3Y*
72.37%
5Y*
111.39%
10Y*
120.60%

CRVS

1D
0.27%
1M
-28.30%
YTD
44.81%
6M
30.26%
1Y
185.17%
3Y*
46.04%
5Y*
31.93%
10Y*
-1.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APLD vs. CRVS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation
66.99%220.94%13.35%266.30%-56.09%11,789.90%389.44%-34.55%64.99%-33.33%
CRVS
Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
44.81%43.93%203.98%107.06%-64.73%-32.30%-34.56%48.23%-64.58%-27.55%

Correlation

The correlation between APLD and CRVS is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2016

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APLD:

$11.12B

CRVS:

$1.00B

EPS

APLD:

-$0.72

CRVS:

-$0.53

PB Ratio

APLD:

7.06

CRVS:

4.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

APLD:

$390.57M

CRVS:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

APLD:

$124.93M

CRVS:

-$26.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

APLD:

-$154.66M

CRVS:

-$47.43M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APLD vs. CRVS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APLD
APLD Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
APLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
APLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

CRVS
CRVS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CRVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRVS Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CRVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRVS Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APLD vs. CRVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) and Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APLDCRVSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.48

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

3.30

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

7.42

+1.72

APLD vs. CRVS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the CRVS Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APLD and CRVS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APLDCRVSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.03

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.24

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

-0.01

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

-0.02

+0.10

Drawdowns

APLD vs. CRVS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APLD drawdown since its inception was -99.70%, roughly equal to the maximum CRVS drawdown of -96.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APLD and CRVS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APLDCRVSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.70%

-96.97%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.31%

-56.43%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.66%

-70.50%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.61%

-92.40%

+9.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.80%

-96.97%

+7.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.53%

-56.31%

+38.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.49%

-69.32%

-5.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.15%

25.07%

-2.92%

Volatility

APLD vs. CRVS - Volatility Comparison

Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) has a higher volatility of 32.64% compared to Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRVS) at 23.70%. This indicates that APLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APLDCRVSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.64%

23.70%

+8.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

80.09%

111.87%

-31.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.26%

181.10%

-73.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

165.20%

131.06%

+34.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

301.59%

111.16%

+190.43%

Dividends

APLD vs. CRVS - Dividend Comparison

Neither APLD nor CRVS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

APLD vs. CRVS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Digital Corporation and Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
161.76M
0
(APLD) Total Revenue
(CRVS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


APLD and CRVS have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APLD has higher volatility (32.64%) compared to CRVS (23.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APLD dropped -99.70% vs CRVS's -96.97%.

APLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APLD and CRVS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer