PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APH vs. BDGI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APH vs. BDGI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. (BDGI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

APH is traded in USD, while BDGI.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BDGI.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly lower than BDGI.TO's 26.22% return. Over the past 10 years, APH has outperformed BDGI.TO with an annualized return of 26.67%, while BDGI.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 16.43% annualized return.


APH

1D
3.45%
1M
12.16%
YTD
6.47%
6M
2.93%
1Y
54.90%
3Y*
55.57%
5Y*
34.64%
10Y*
26.67%

BDGI.TO

1D
5.44%
1M
9.14%
YTD
26.22%
6M
21.04%
1Y
104.65%
3Y*
52.00%
5Y*
18.36%
10Y*
16.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APH vs. BDGI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APH
Amphenol Corporation
6.47%96.08%41.30%31.85%-11.96%35.25%22.09%34.91%-6.82%31.81%
BDGI.TO
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.
26.22%116.68%-17.29%59.81%-19.27%-14.92%12.95%15.26%11.51%-7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between APH and BDGI.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.27

The correlation between APH and BDGI.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

APH:

$185.20B

BDGI.TO:

CA$3.16B

EPS

APH:

$4.58

BDGI.TO:

CA$2.01

PE Ratio

APH:

31.32

BDGI.TO:

46.56

PEG Ratio

APH:

1.04

BDGI.TO:

1.29

PS Ratio

APH:

7.11

BDGI.TO:

3.31

PB Ratio

APH:

13.25

BDGI.TO:

10.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

APH:

$25.90B

BDGI.TO:

CA$955.05M

Gross Profit (TTM)

APH:

$9.67B

BDGI.TO:

CA$221.07M

EBITDA (TTM)

APH:

$7.45B

BDGI.TO:

CA$178.82M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APH vs. BDGI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APH
APH Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
APH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
APH Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
APH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
APH Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGI.TO
BDGI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BDGI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDGI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDGI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BDGI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDGI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APH vs. BDGI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. (BDGI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APHBDGI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.49

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

4.02

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

10.86

-5.80

APH vs. BDGI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APH Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the BDGI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APH and BDGI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APHBDGI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.91

-1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

0.54

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

0.46

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.65

-0.02

Drawdowns

APH vs. BDGI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, roughly equal to the maximum BDGI.TO drawdown of -64.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and BDGI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APHBDGI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-64.68%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.19%

-26.18%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.19%

-34.01%

+5.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.73%

-42.44%

+13.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.56%

-64.68%

+27.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.45%

0.00%

-13.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-22.48%

+8.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.87%

9.67%

+1.20%

Volatility

APH vs. BDGI.TO - Volatility Comparison

Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a higher volatility of 16.86% compared to Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. (BDGI.TO) at 8.66%. This indicates that APH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APHBDGI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.86%

8.66%

+8.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.53%

30.63%

+5.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.97%

36.29%

+4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.54%

34.03%

-3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.83%

35.67%

-7.84%

Dividends

APH vs. BDGI.TO - Dividend Comparison

APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than BDGI.TO's 0.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APH
Amphenol Corporation
0.58%0.55%0.79%1.07%1.06%0.89%0.80%0.89%1.09%0.80%0.86%1.01%
BDGI.TO
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.
0.81%1.03%2.01%1.69%2.48%1.97%1.57%1.62%1.61%1.55%1.20%1.47%

Financials

APH vs. BDGI.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
7.62B
203.24M
(APH) Total Revenue
(BDGI.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. APH values in USD, BDGI.TO values in CAD

APH vs. BDGI.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amphenol Corporation and Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
36.8%
24.5%
Portfolio components
APH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 7.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

BDGI.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. reported a gross profit of 49.86M and revenue of 203.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

APH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.83B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

BDGI.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. reported an operating income of 13.08M and revenue of 203.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.

APH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 2.35B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.

BDGI.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd. reported a net income of 862.00K and revenue of 203.24M, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


APH and BDGI.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APH and BDGI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer