APG vs. PWR
APG (APi Group Corporation) and PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, APG returned 22.71%/yr vs 49.77%/yr for PWR. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
APG vs. PWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APG achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 64.46% return.
APG
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- 29.87%
- 3Y*
- 37.01%
- 5Y*
- 22.71%
- 10Y*
- —
PWR
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -6.87%
- YTD
- 64.46%
- 6M
- 49.89%
- 1Y
- 92.19%
- 3Y*
- 56.18%
- 5Y*
- 49.77%
- 10Y*
- 40.58%
APG vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APG APi Group Corporation | 10.30% | 59.55% | 3.96% | 83.94% | -27.01% | 41.98% | 79.17% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 64.46% | 33.70% | 46.60% | 51.70% | 24.63% | 59.50% | 94.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between APG and PWR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2020 | 0.57 |
The correlation between APG and PWR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
APG:
$18.36B
PWR:
$105.52B
APG:
$0.73
PWR:
$7.29
APG:
57.90
PWR:
95.17
APG:
0.12
PWR:
4.72
APG:
2.19
PWR:
3.51
APG:
5.27
PWR:
11.67
APG:
$8.17B
PWR:
$29.99B
APG:
$2.57B
PWR:
$4.08B
APG:
$820.00M
PWR:
$2.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APG vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank
APG
PWR
APG vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for APi Group Corporation (APG) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APG | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.43 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 7.45 | -5.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.22 | 17.97 | -12.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APG | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 2.55 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 1.41 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.35 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
APG vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APG drawdown since its inception was -49.62%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APG and PWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APG | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.62% | -97.07% | +47.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.83% | -12.45% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.23% | -33.89% | +12.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.62% | -33.89% | -15.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.57% | -11.64% | -2.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.33% | -46.86% | +36.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.74% | 5.15% | +0.59% |
Volatility
APG vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for APi Group Corporation (APG) is 7.39%, while Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a volatility of 11.16%. This indicates that APG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APG | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 11.16% | -3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.05% | 29.60% | -7.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.89% | 36.37% | -8.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.53% | 35.62% | -3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.07% | 33.70% | -0.63% |
Dividends
APG vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison
APG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APG APi Group Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% |
Financials
APG vs. PWR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between APi Group Corporation and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
APG vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison
APG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, APi Group Corporation reported a gross profit of 620.00M and revenue of 1.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.
PWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.
APG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, APi Group Corporation reported an operating income of 103.00M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.
PWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
APG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, APi Group Corporation reported a net income of 51.00M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.
PWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
APG and PWR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWR has higher volatility (11.16%) compared to APG (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APG dropped -49.62% vs PWR's -97.07%.
PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APG and PWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer