PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOM vs. TRRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOM vs. TRRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and T. Rowe Price Retirement Balanced Fund (TRRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOM achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly higher than TRRIX's 3.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AOM having a 6.19% annualized return and TRRIX not far ahead at 6.45%.


AOM

1D
0.41%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
4.18%
6M
4.84%
1Y
13.33%
3Y*
10.66%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
6.19%

TRRIX

1D
-1.30%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
3.88%
6M
3.69%
1Y
11.09%
3Y*
10.41%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
6.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOM vs. TRRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
4.18%13.28%7.95%12.38%-14.54%6.93%10.02%15.58%-3.88%11.63%
TRRIX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Balanced Fund
3.88%11.02%9.96%11.57%-13.16%8.63%11.48%15.32%-3.29%10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between AOM and TRRIX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2008

0.87

The correlation between AOM and TRRIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOM vs. TRRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOM
AOM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
AOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

TRRIX
TRRIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TRRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOM vs. TRRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and T. Rowe Price Retirement Balanced Fund (TRRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AOMTRRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.37

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.37

9.93

+1.44

AOM vs. TRRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the TRRIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOM and TRRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOMTRRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

1.88

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.67

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.90

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.82

-0.13

Drawdowns

AOM vs. TRRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOM drawdown since its inception was -19.96%, smaller than the maximum TRRIX drawdown of -27.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOM and TRRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOMTRRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.96%

-27.77%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-4.85%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.85%

-6.10%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.96%

-18.13%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.96%

-18.57%

-1.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-1.50%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-2.84%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

1.14%

+0.04%

Volatility

AOM vs. TRRIX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to T. Rowe Price Retirement Balanced Fund (TRRIX) at 2.15%. This indicates that AOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOMTRRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

2.15%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.42%

5.27%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.72%

6.12%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.17%

7.12%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.95%

7.23%

+0.72%

AOM vs. TRRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TRRIX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

AOM vs. TRRIX - Dividend Comparison

AOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than TRRIX's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
3.01%2.98%3.10%2.79%2.27%1.56%2.02%2.66%2.53%3.31%2.14%1.98%
TRRIX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Balanced Fund
4.71%4.86%5.78%4.32%10.15%12.67%9.27%3.39%7.01%5.07%3.40%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOM and TRRIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOM has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to TRRIX (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOM dropped -19.96% vs TRRIX's -27.77%.

AOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOM and TRRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer