AOM vs. JEPI
AOM (iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF) and JEPI (JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AOM is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S&P Target Risk Moderate, while JEPI is a Dividend fund actively managed by JPMorgan. AOM is passively managed, while JEPI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AOM returned 4.61%/yr vs 7.28%/yr for JEPI. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOM charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPI.
Performance
AOM vs. JEPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOM achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly higher than JEPI's 0.04% return.
AOM
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 4.18%
- 6M
- 4.84%
- 1Y
- 13.33%
- 3Y*
- 10.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
JEPI
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 7.03%
- 3Y*
- 8.80%
- 5Y*
- 7.28%
- 10Y*
- —
AOM vs. JEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | 4.18% | 13.28% | 7.95% | 12.38% | -14.54% | 6.93% | 13.87% |
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | 0.04% | 8.09% | 12.57% | 9.83% | -3.49% | 21.52% | 18.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOM and JEPI is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2020 | 0.71 |
The correlation between AOM and JEPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
AOM vs. JEPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AOM
JEPI
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AOM
JEPI
Financial Services
AOM
JEPI
Industrials
AOM
JEPI
Consumer Cyclical
AOM
JEPI
Communication Services
AOM
JEPI
Healthcare
AOM
JEPI
Consumer Defensive
AOM
JEPI
Energy
AOM
JEPI
Basic Materials
AOM
JEPI
Utilities
AOM
JEPI
Real Estate
AOM
JEPI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOM vs. JEPI — Risk / Return Rank
AOM
JEPI
AOM vs. JEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOM | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.17 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 1.06 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 3.31 | +8.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOM | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 0.90 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.66 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.01 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
AOM vs. JEPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOM drawdown since its inception was -19.96%, which is greater than JEPI's maximum drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOM and JEPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOM | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.96% | -13.71% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.11% | -6.68% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.85% | -13.26% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.96% | -13.71% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -4.93% | +3.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.70% | -2.12% | -0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.18% | 2.13% | -0.95% |
Volatility
AOM vs. JEPI - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) at 1.48%. This indicates that AOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOM | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.40% | 1.48% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.42% | 6.09% | -0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.72% | 7.89% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.17% | 11.06% | -2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.95% | 10.79% | -2.84% |
AOM vs. JEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOM vs. JEPI - Dividend Comparison
AOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than JEPI's 8.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | 3.01% | 2.98% | 3.10% | 2.79% | 2.27% | 1.56% | 2.02% | 2.66% | 2.53% | 3.31% | 2.14% | 1.98% |
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | 8.28% | 8.25% | 7.33% | 8.40% | 11.68% | 6.59% | 5.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOM and JEPI have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AOM has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to JEPI (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOM dropped -19.96% vs JEPI's -13.71%.
On 5-year performance, JEPI leads with 7.28% vs 4.61% for AOM. On fees, AOM is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, JEPI has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JEPI has performed better with a 7.28% return vs 4.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AOM is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPI.
JEPI has the higher dividend yield at 8.28%, compared with 3.01% for AOM.
AOM is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while JEPI is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AOM and 0.35% for JEPI.
AOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AOM and JEPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer