ANXG.L vs. NADQ.DE
ANXG.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and NADQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist) are both Nasdaq-100 funds from Amundi - ANXG.L tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index while NADQ.DE tracks the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ANXG.L returned 18.08%/yr vs 22.63%/yr for NADQ.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANXG.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for NADQ.DE.
Performance
ANXG.L vs. NADQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ANXG.L is traded in GBp, while NADQ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NADQ.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANXG.L achieves a 17.42% return, which is significantly lower than NADQ.DE's 19.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ANXG.L has underperformed NADQ.DE with an annualized return of 18.08%, while NADQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 22.63% annualized return.
ANXG.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 17.42%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- 24.81%
- 5Y*
- 18.36%
- 10Y*
- 18.08%
NADQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 19.63%
- 6M
- 17.68%
- 1Y
- 41.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 19.08%
- 10Y*
- 22.63%
ANXG.L vs. NADQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 17.42% | 11.70% | 28.70% | 48.00% | -25.42% | 29.85% | 43.37% | 34.20% | -22.02% | 32.58% |
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 19.63% | 12.61% | 28.23% | 48.44% | -26.07% | 29.89% | 42.33% | 35.59% | 4.74% | 20.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANXG.L and NADQ.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2010 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, ANXG.L and NADQ.DE have become more correlated (0.96) than their long-term average of 0.72, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANXG.L vs. NADQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ANXG.L
NADQ.DE
ANXG.L vs. NADQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANXG.L | NADQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.47 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 3.76 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.11 | 10.96 | -0.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANXG.L | NADQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 2.72 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.97 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 1.18 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.00 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
ANXG.L vs. NADQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANXG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.00%, which is greater than NADQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXG.L and NADQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANXG.L | NADQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.00% | -28.27% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.04% | -11.02% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.54% | -25.19% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.69% | -27.53% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.00% | -27.53% | -5.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -0.79% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.03% | -4.96% | -1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 3.79% | -0.02% |
Volatility
ANXG.L vs. NADQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANXG.L | NADQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 4.52% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.57% | 10.67% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.89% | 15.23% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 19.40% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 19.48% | +1.62% |
ANXG.L vs. NADQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANXG.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than NADQ.DE's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ANXG.L vs. NADQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
ANXG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NADQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.55% | 0.40% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, ANXG.L and NADQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ANXG.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANXG.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for NADQ.DE.
ANXG.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while NADQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXG.L and 0.22% for NADQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for ANXG.L and NADQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer