ANXG.L vs. CNDX.AS
ANXG.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and CNDX.AS (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from Amundi and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ANXG.L returned 18.08%/yr vs 22.42%/yr for CNDX.AS. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANXG.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for CNDX.AS.
Performance
ANXG.L vs. CNDX.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ANXG.L is traded in GBp, while CNDX.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CNDX.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANXG.L achieves a 17.42% return, which is significantly lower than CNDX.AS's 20.01% return. Over the past 10 years, ANXG.L has underperformed CNDX.AS with an annualized return of 18.08%, while CNDX.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 22.42% annualized return.
ANXG.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 17.42%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- 24.81%
- 5Y*
- 18.36%
- 10Y*
- 18.08%
CNDX.AS
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 20.01%
- 6M
- 17.64%
- 1Y
- 40.93%
- 3Y*
- 24.70%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- 22.42%
ANXG.L vs. CNDX.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXG.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 17.42% | 11.70% | 28.70% | 48.00% | -25.42% | 29.85% | 43.37% | 34.20% | -22.02% | 32.58% |
CNDX.AS iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 20.01% | 11.84% | 29.14% | 47.41% | -26.28% | 30.57% | 43.51% | 32.54% | 5.56% | 21.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANXG.L and CNDX.AS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2011 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, ANXG.L and CNDX.AS have become more correlated (0.96) than their long-term average of 0.74, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANXG.L vs. CNDX.AS — Risk / Return Rank
ANXG.L
CNDX.AS
ANXG.L vs. CNDX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANXG.L | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.48 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 3.71 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.11 | 10.83 | -0.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANXG.L | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 2.74 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 1.13 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.06 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
ANXG.L vs. CNDX.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANXG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.00%, which is greater than CNDX.AS's maximum drawdown of -27.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXG.L and CNDX.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANXG.L | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.00% | -27.59% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.04% | -11.00% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.54% | -24.96% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.69% | -27.59% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.00% | -27.59% | -5.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -0.69% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.03% | -4.64% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 3.80% | -0.03% |
Volatility
ANXG.L vs. CNDX.AS - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANXG.L | CNDX.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 4.62% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.57% | 10.47% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.89% | 14.94% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 19.29% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 19.58% | +1.52% |
ANXG.L vs. CNDX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANXG.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.AS's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANXG.L vs. CNDX.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANXG.L nor CNDX.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, ANXG.L and CNDX.AS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ANXG.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANXG.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CNDX.AS.
Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXG.L and 0.36% for CNDX.AS.
Find the right allocation for ANXG.L and CNDX.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer