ANET vs. FWRG.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

ANET (Arista Networks, Inc.) is a stock, while FWRG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Over the past year, ANET returned 60.82% vs 27.47% for FWRG.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ANET vs. FWRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANET achieves a 19.36% return, which is significantly higher than FWRG.L's 10.38% return.

ANET

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: 10.32%
• YTD: 19.36%
• 6M: 21.14%
• 1Y: 60.82%
• 3Y*: 56.72%
• 5Y*: 47.39%
• 10Y*: 42.38%

FWRG.L

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 10.38%
• 6M: 10.61%
• 1Y: 27.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANET vs. FWRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ANET Arista Networks, Inc.	19.36%	18.55%	87.73%	58.25%
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc	10.38%	13.84%	20.11%	8,531.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ANET and FWRG.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023	0.37

Return for Risk

ANET vs. FWRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANET

ANET Risk / Return Rank: 74
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FWRG.L

FWRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FWRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FWRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FWRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FWRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANET vs. FWRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANET	FWRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	2.64	-1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	3.67	-1.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.50	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	3.83	-1.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.51	15.43	-10.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANET vs. FWRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANET Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANET and FWRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANET	FWRG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	2.64	-1.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.09	+0.73

Drawdowns

ANET vs. FWRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANET drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, which is greater than FWRG.L's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANET and FWRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANET	FWRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.20%	-18.87%	-33.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.33%	-7.14%	-21.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.00%	-1.80%	-10.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.40%	-2.26%	-13.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.53%	1.78%	+11.75%

Volatility

ANET vs. FWRG.L - Volatility Comparison

Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a higher volatility of 16.83% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) at 3.01%. This indicates that ANET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANET	FWRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.83%	3.01%	+13.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.41%	7.77%	+32.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.48%	10.39%	+43.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.20%	4,499.48%	-4,452.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.99%	4,499.48%	-4,454.49%

Dividends

ANET vs. FWRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANET nor FWRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANET and FWRG.L in my portfolio?

ANET and FWRG.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.