AMZN vs. FWRA.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) is a stock, while FWRA.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Over the past year, AMZN returned 14.82% vs 25.89% for FWRA.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AMZN vs. FWRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly lower than FWRA.L's 9.27% return.

AMZN

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -10.07%
• YTD: 6.24%
• 6M: 8.08%
• 1Y: 14.82%
• 3Y*: 25.71%
• 5Y*: 8.37%
• 10Y*: 21.19%

FWRA.L

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 9.27%
• 6M: 10.72%
• 1Y: 25.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZN vs. FWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc	6.24%	5.21%	44.39%	19.33%
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation	9.27%	22.42%	18.04%	10.02%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZN and FWRA.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023	0.39

Return for Risk

AMZN vs. FWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZN

AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 56
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 51
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 59

FWRA.L

FWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZN vs. FWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMZN	FWRA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	2.07	-1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.89	3.08	-2.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.38	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	2.95	-2.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.64	12.33	-10.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMZN vs. FWRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZN Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZN and FWRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMZN	FWRA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49	2.07	-1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	1.51	-0.95

Drawdowns

AMZN vs. FWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than FWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and FWRA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZN	FWRA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.40%	-16.50%	-77.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.74%	-8.78%	-12.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.83%	-2.75%	-8.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.12%	-1.92%	-26.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.08%	2.10%	+6.98%

Volatility

AMZN vs. FWRA.L - Volatility Comparison

Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) at 3.90%. This indicates that AMZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZN	FWRA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.80%	3.90%	+3.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.58%	9.98%	+10.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.13%	12.55%	+17.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.53%	13.63%	+21.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.48%	13.63%	+18.85%

Dividends

AMZN vs. FWRA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMZN nor FWRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZN and FWRA.L in my portfolio?

AMZN and FWRA.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.