PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZN vs. BATS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMZN vs. BATS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AMZN is traded in USD, while BATS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BATS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly lower than BATS.L's 6.61% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZN has outperformed BATS.L with an annualized return of 21.19%, while BATS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.61% annualized return.


AMZN

1D
-0.33%
1M
-10.07%
YTD
6.24%
6M
8.08%
1Y
14.82%
3Y*
25.71%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
21.19%

BATS.L

1D
1.53%
1M
2.50%
YTD
6.61%
6M
6.64%
1Y
33.10%
3Y*
32.48%
5Y*
17.13%
10Y*
6.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZN vs. BATS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
6.24%5.21%44.39%80.88%-49.62%2.38%76.26%23.03%28.43%55.96%
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
6.61%68.15%34.95%-19.48%14.47%8.11%-6.84%43.84%-50.14%24.18%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZN and BATS.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.15

The correlation between AMZN and BATS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (3 years) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMZN:

$2.67T

BATS.L:

£97.89B

EPS

AMZN:

$8.37

BATS.L:

£4.91

PE Ratio

AMZN:

29.29

BATS.L:

9.10

PEG Ratio

AMZN:

0.71

BATS.L:

0.34

PS Ratio

AMZN:

3.58

BATS.L:

1.91

PB Ratio

AMZN:

6.03

BATS.L:

2.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMZN:

$742.78B

BATS.L:

£51.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMZN:

$348.59B

BATS.L:

£35.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMZN:

$152.71B

BATS.L:

£17.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZN vs. BATS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZN
AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

BATS.L
BATS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BATS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BATS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZN vs. BATS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZNBATS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.24

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

2.36

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.64

5.67

-4.03

AMZN vs. BATS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZN Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the BATS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZN and BATS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZNBATS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

1.44

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.79

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.27

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.26

+0.30

Drawdowns

AMZN vs. BATS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than BATS.L's maximum drawdown of -56.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and BATS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZNBATS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.40%

-56.29%

-38.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.74%

-13.98%

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.88%

-14.60%

-16.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.15%

-30.31%

-25.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.15%

-56.29%

+0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.83%

-10.37%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.12%

-17.59%

-10.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.08%

5.82%

+3.26%

Volatility

AMZN vs. BATS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) is 7.80%, while British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) has a volatility of 9.64%. This indicates that AMZN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZNBATS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.80%

9.64%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.58%

18.51%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.13%

22.90%

+7.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.53%

21.79%

+13.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.48%

24.86%

+7.62%

Dividends

AMZN vs. BATS.L - Dividend Comparison

AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BATS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
5.40%5.70%8.18%10.06%6.64%7.89%7.77%6.28%7.81%4.35%

Financials

AMZN vs. BATS.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amazon.com, Inc and British American Tobacco plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
181.52B
13.54B
(AMZN) Total Revenue
(BATS.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AMZN values in USD, BATS.L values in GBp

AMZN vs. BATS.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amazon.com, Inc and British American Tobacco plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
36.8%
61.1%
Portfolio components
AMZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

BATS.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported a gross profit of 8.28B and revenue of 13.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.

AMZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

BATS.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported an operating income of 5.02B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.

AMZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.

BATS.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported a net income of 3.25B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMZN and BATS.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZN and BATS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer