AME vs. ROL
AME (AMETEK, Inc.) and ROL (Rollins, Inc.) are both stocks. AME operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while ROL operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, AME returned 17.46%/yr vs 15.27%/yr for ROL. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AME vs. ROL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AME achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly higher than ROL's -21.89% return. Over the past 10 years, AME has outperformed ROL with an annualized return of 17.46%, while ROL has yielded a comparatively lower 15.27% annualized return.
AME
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -2.78%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 27.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.46%
- 10Y*
- 17.46%
ROL
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -13.17%
- YTD
- -21.89%
- 6M
- -22.56%
- 1Y
- -18.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.27%
AME vs. ROL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AME AMETEK, Inc. | 10.23% | 14.66% | 10.01% | 18.81% | -4.33% | 22.32% | 22.19% | 48.27% | -5.89% | 49.98% |
ROL Rollins, Inc. | -21.89% | 31.06% | 7.56% | 21.19% | 8.10% | -11.43% | 78.47% | -6.95% | 17.61% | 39.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between AME and ROL is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987 | 0.35 |
The correlation between AME and ROL shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AME:
$51.93B
ROL:
$22.42B
AME:
$6.62
ROL:
$1.10
AME:
34.14
ROL:
42.54
AME:
3.19
ROL:
3.85
AME:
6.86
ROL:
5.86
AME:
4.33
ROL:
16.23
AME:
$7.60B
ROL:
$3.84B
AME:
$2.06B
ROL:
$1.53B
AME:
$2.15B
ROL:
$859.94M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AME vs. ROL — Risk / Return Rank
AME
ROL
AME vs. ROL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMETEK, Inc. (AME) and Rollins, Inc. (ROL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AME | ROL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.87 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | -0.60 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | -1.85 | +8.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AME | ROL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | -0.77 | +2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.35 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.61 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.50 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
AME vs. ROL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AME drawdown since its inception was -53.31%, smaller than the maximum ROL drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AME and ROL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AME | ROL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.31% | -57.27% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -30.90% | +17.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.04% | -30.90% | +7.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.06% | -30.90% | +3.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.72% | -30.90% | -11.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.39% | -28.54% | +22.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.91% | -12.13% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 9.97% | -5.77% |
Volatility
AME vs. ROL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMETEK, Inc. (AME) is 5.10%, while Rollins, Inc. (ROL) has a volatility of 8.75%. This indicates that AME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AME | ROL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 8.75% | -3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.42% | 19.11% | -2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.80% | 24.09% | -2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.66% | 24.57% | -2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 25.04% | -0.62% |
Dividends
AME vs. ROL - Dividend Comparison
AME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than ROL's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AME AMETEK, Inc. | 0.56% | 0.60% | 0.62% | 0.61% | 0.63% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.56% | 0.83% | 0.50% | 0.74% | 0.67% |
ROL Rollins, Inc. | 1.53% | 1.13% | 1.33% | 1.24% | 1.18% | 1.23% | 0.84% | 1.42% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.18% | 1.62% |
Financials
AME vs. ROL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AMETEK, Inc. and Rollins, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AME vs. ROL - Profitability Comparison
AME - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMETEK, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ROL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 906.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AME - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMETEK, Inc. reported an operating income of 514.94M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.7%.
ROL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported an operating income of 145.49M and revenue of 906.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.
AME - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMETEK, Inc. reported a net income of 399.36M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.
ROL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rollins, Inc. reported a net income of 107.84M and revenue of 906.42M, resulting in a net margin of 11.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AME and ROL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROL has higher volatility (8.75%) compared to AME (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AME dropped -53.31% vs ROL's -57.27%.
AME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AME and ROL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer