PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AME vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AME vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMETEK, Inc. (AME) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AME achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 11.12% return. Over the past 10 years, AME has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 17.46%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.63% annualized return.


AME

1D
-0.26%
1M
-2.78%
YTD
10.23%
6M
13.57%
1Y
27.52%
3Y*
15.24%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
17.46%

AAPL

1D
-1.89%
1M
2.90%
YTD
11.12%
6M
8.71%
1Y
48.46%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
19.46%
10Y*
29.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AME vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AME
AMETEK, Inc.
10.23%14.66%10.01%18.81%-4.33%22.32%22.19%48.27%-5.89%49.98%
AAPL
Apple Inc
11.12%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between AME and AAPL is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984

0.27

The correlation between AME and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AME:

$51.93B

AAPL:

$4.45T

EPS

AME:

$6.62

AAPL:

$8.24

PE Ratio

AME:

34.14

AAPL:

36.61

PEG Ratio

AME:

3.19

AAPL:

4.82

PS Ratio

AME:

6.86

AAPL:

9.94

PB Ratio

AME:

4.33

AAPL:

41.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

AME:

$7.60B

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AME:

$2.06B

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

AME:

$2.15B

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AME vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AME
AME Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
AME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AME Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AME Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AME Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AME vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMETEK, Inc. (AME) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMEAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.39

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

3.53

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

8.89

-2.31

AME vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AME Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AME and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMEAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

2.18

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.71

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

1.03

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.44

+0.04

Drawdowns

AME vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AME drawdown since its inception was -53.31%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AME and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMEAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.31%

-81.80%

+28.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

-13.80%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.04%

-33.36%

+10.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.06%

-33.36%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.72%

-38.52%

-4.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.39%

-4.33%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.91%

-29.60%

+17.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

5.48%

-1.28%

Volatility

AME vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMETEK, Inc. (AME) is 5.10%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that AME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMEAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

5.68%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.42%

15.99%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.80%

22.41%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

27.47%

-5.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.42%

28.91%

-4.49%

Dividends

AME vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

AME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than AAPL's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
AME
AMETEK, Inc.
0.56%0.60%0.62%0.61%0.63%0.54%0.60%0.56%0.83%0.50%0.74%0.67%

Financials

AME vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AMETEK, Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20222023202420252026
1.93B
111.18B
(AME) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AME vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AMETEK, Inc. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
49.3%
Portfolio components
AME - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMETEK, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

AME - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMETEK, Inc. reported an operating income of 514.94M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.7%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

AME - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMETEK, Inc. reported a net income of 399.36M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AME and AAPL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPL has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to AME (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AME dropped -53.31% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AME and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer