AMAT vs. RKLB
AMAT (Applied Materials, Inc.) and RKLB (Rocket Lab USA, Inc.) are both stocks. AMAT operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while RKLB operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, AMAT returned 54.75%/yr vs 179.23%/yr for RKLB. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMAT vs. RKLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMAT achieves a 91.99% return, which is significantly higher than RKLB's 62.92% return.
AMAT
- 1D
- 8.64%
- 1M
- 13.17%
- YTD
- 91.99%
- 6M
- 83.99%
- 1Y
- 197.34%
- 3Y*
- 54.75%
- 5Y*
- 30.69%
- 10Y*
- 36.71%
RKLB
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- 7.76%
- YTD
- 62.92%
- 6M
- 120.42%
- 1Y
- 292.98%
- 3Y*
- 179.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMAT vs. RKLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 91.99% | 59.60% | 1.13% | 67.97% | -37.54% | 20.09% |
RKLB Rocket Lab USA, Inc. | 62.92% | 173.89% | 360.58% | 46.68% | -69.30% | 8.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMAT and RKLB is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2021 | 0.38 |
The correlation between AMAT and RKLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AMAT:
$393.24B
RKLB:
$68.81B
AMAT:
$10.61
RKLB:
-$0.33
AMAT:
13.60
RKLB:
92.89
AMAT:
16.45
RKLB:
30.39
AMAT:
$29.02B
RKLB:
$679.58M
AMAT:
$14.21B
RKLB:
$248.43M
AMAT:
$9.92B
RKLB:
-$177.36M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMAT vs. RKLB — Risk / Return Rank
AMAT
RKLB
AMAT vs. RKLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Rocket Lab USA, Inc. (RKLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMAT | RKLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.39 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.29 | 6.86 | +2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.48 | 15.94 | +10.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMAT | RKLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.15 | 3.20 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.76 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
AMAT vs. RKLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMAT drawdown since its inception was -85.22%, roughly equal to the maximum RKLB drawdown of -82.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAT and RKLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMAT | RKLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.22% | -82.96% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.37% | -43.01% | +21.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.88% | -55.49% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -24.35% | +22.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.80% | -51.40% | +12.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.49% | 18.48% | -10.99% |
Volatility
AMAT vs. RKLB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) is 19.01%, while Rocket Lab USA, Inc. (RKLB) has a volatility of 41.86%. This indicates that AMAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RKLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMAT | RKLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.01% | 41.86% | -22.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.52% | 72.23% | -34.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.94% | 92.32% | -44.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.93% | 81.48% | -37.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.81% | 81.48% | -38.67% |
Dividends
AMAT vs. RKLB - Dividend Comparison
AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while RKLB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.39% | 0.69% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% |
RKLB Rocket Lab USA, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AMAT vs. RKLB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Materials, Inc. and Rocket Lab USA, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMAT vs. RKLB - Profitability Comparison
AMAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.95B and revenue of 7.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.9%.
RKLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rocket Lab USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 76.49M and revenue of 200.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.2%.
AMAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.52B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.9%.
RKLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rocket Lab USA, Inc. reported an operating income of -55.97M and revenue of 200.35M, resulting in an operating margin of -27.9%.
AMAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.81B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.
RKLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rocket Lab USA, Inc. reported a net income of -45.02M and revenue of 200.35M, resulting in a net margin of -22.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMAT and RKLB have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RKLB has higher volatility (41.86%) compared to AMAT (19.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAT dropped -85.22% vs RKLB's -82.96%.
AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.15 vs 3.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMAT and RKLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer