PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AM.PA vs. CHG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AM.PA vs. CHG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Dassault Aviation SA (AM.PA) and Chemring Group plc (CHG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AM.PA is traded in EUR, while CHG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CHG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AM.PA having a 9.81% return and CHG.L slightly higher at 10.03%. Over the past 10 years, AM.PA has underperformed CHG.L with an annualized return of 13.36%, while CHG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.33% annualized return.


AM.PA

1D
3.14%
1M
3.67%
YTD
9.81%
6M
11.52%
1Y
-4.61%
3Y*
24.01%
5Y*
26.17%
10Y*
13.36%

CHG.L

1D
1.94%
1M
6.12%
YTD
10.03%
6M
8.27%
1Y
-13.36%
3Y*
22.20%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
15.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AM.PA vs. CHG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AM.PA
Dassault Aviation SA
9.81%40.99%11.84%15.29%69.25%7.26%-23.33%-1.64%-5.90%23.37%
CHG.L
Chemring Group plc
10.03%38.90%0.15%22.92%-3.12%12.04%14.33%62.21%-11.98%5.11%

Correlation

The correlation between AM.PA and CHG.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.18

Over the past year, AM.PA and CHG.L have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AM.PA vs. CHG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AM.PA
AM.PA Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AM.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AM.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
AM.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
AM.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
AM.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

CHG.L
CHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AM.PA vs. CHG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dassault Aviation SA (AM.PA) and Chemring Group plc (CHG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AM.PACHG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.95

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

-0.56

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.42

-1.08

+0.65

AM.PA vs. CHG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AM.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is higher than the CHG.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AM.PA and CHG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AM.PACHG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

-0.42

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.45

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.45

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.07

+0.37

Drawdowns

AM.PA vs. CHG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AM.PA drawdown since its inception was -62.62%, smaller than the maximum CHG.L drawdown of -77.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AM.PA and CHG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AM.PACHG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.62%

-77.99%

+15.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.80%

-23.72%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.02%

-26.92%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.32%

-30.26%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.62%

-47.53%

-15.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.92%

-13.57%

-1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.42%

-43.58%

+26.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.87%

12.40%

-2.53%

Volatility

AM.PA vs. CHG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dassault Aviation SA (AM.PA) is 8.91%, while Chemring Group plc (CHG.L) has a volatility of 13.35%. This indicates that AM.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AM.PACHG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.91%

13.35%

-4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.18%

24.47%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.09%

31.57%

-0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.20%

30.13%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.83%

33.71%

-4.88%

Dividends

AM.PA vs. CHG.L - Dividend Comparison

AM.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than CHG.L's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AM.PA
Dassault Aviation SA
1.62%1.72%1.71%1.67%1.57%1.29%0.00%1.81%1.26%0.93%1.14%0.87%
CHG.L
Chemring Group plc
1.57%1.67%2.19%1.74%1.71%1.42%1.30%1.41%1.92%1.25%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AM.PA vs. CHG.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dassault Aviation SA and Chemring Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. AM.PA values in EUR, CHG.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


AM.PA and CHG.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AM.PA and CHG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer