PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALLE vs. CLS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALLE vs. CLS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allegion plc (ALLE) and Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ALLE is traded in USD, while CLS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CLS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALLE achieves a -19.54% return, which is significantly lower than CLS.TO's 30.20% return. Over the past 10 years, ALLE has underperformed CLS.TO with an annualized return of 7.81%, while CLS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 43.13% annualized return.


ALLE

1D
-1.94%
1M
-5.02%
YTD
-19.54%
6M
-19.10%
1Y
-7.03%
3Y*
5.79%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
7.81%

CLS.TO

1D
3.51%
1M
2.58%
YTD
30.20%
6M
13.02%
1Y
218.72%
3Y*
209.37%
5Y*
114.69%
10Y*
43.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALLE vs. CLS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALLE
Allegion plc
-19.54%23.54%4.66%22.32%-19.26%15.06%-5.41%57.89%1.18%25.32%
CLS.TO
Celestica Inc.
30.20%220.69%215.14%160.52%1.78%37.36%-2.32%-6.08%-16.29%-11.14%

Correlation

The correlation between ALLE and CLS.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2013

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between ALLE and CLS.TO has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALLE:

$11.05B

CLS.TO:

CA$62.28B

EPS

ALLE:

$7.33

CLS.TO:

CA$8.28

PE Ratio

ALLE:

17.42

CLS.TO:

64.97

PEG Ratio

ALLE:

1.94

CLS.TO:

0.87

PS Ratio

ALLE:

2.65

CLS.TO:

4.52

PB Ratio

ALLE:

5.26

CLS.TO:

29.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALLE:

$4.16B

CLS.TO:

CA$13.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALLE:

$1.87B

CLS.TO:

CA$1.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

ALLE:

$965.50M

CLS.TO:

CA$1.36B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALLE vs. CLS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALLE
ALLE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ALLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CLS.TO
CLS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CLS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CLS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALLE vs. CLS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allegion plc (ALLE) and Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALLECLS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.40

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

7.45

-7.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.55

18.87

-19.42

ALLE vs. CLS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALLE Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the CLS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALLE and CLS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALLECLS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

3.07

-3.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

2.04

-2.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.88

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.43

-0.07

Drawdowns

ALLE vs. CLS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALLE drawdown since its inception was -43.25%, smaller than the maximum CLS.TO drawdown of -80.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALLE and CLS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALLECLS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.25%

-80.63%

+37.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.84%

-29.56%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.84%

-53.42%

+23.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.87%

-53.42%

+14.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.25%

-80.63%

+37.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.73%

-18.17%

-10.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.95%

-26.18%

+15.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.76%

11.65%

+1.11%

Volatility

ALLE vs. CLS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allegion plc (ALLE) is 6.79%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a volatility of 27.08%. This indicates that ALLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALLECLS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.79%

27.08%

-20.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.67%

55.16%

-35.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.81%

71.89%

-47.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.03%

56.76%

-30.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.79%

49.36%

-22.57%

Dividends

ALLE vs. CLS.TO - Dividend Comparison

ALLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while CLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALLE
Allegion plc
1.63%1.28%1.47%1.42%1.56%1.09%1.10%0.87%1.05%0.80%0.75%0.61%
CLS.TO
Celestica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ALLE vs. CLS.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allegion plc and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
1.03B
4.05B
(ALLE) Total Revenue
(CLS.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ALLE values in USD, CLS.TO values in CAD

ALLE vs. CLS.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Allegion plc and Celestica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
44.0%
10.8%
Portfolio components
ALLE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegion plc reported a gross profit of 454.50M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.

CLS.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.

ALLE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegion plc reported an operating income of 195.30M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.9%.

CLS.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 267.70M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.

ALLE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegion plc reported a net income of 138.10M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.

CLS.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ALLE and CLS.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALLE and CLS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer